CHURCHILL AS SAMARITAN
Sir, —On reading Rev. Gladstone Hughes' remarks one is struck with the thought that Mr Churchill might be startled to find himself or his common sense gesture to Russia made out as another case of the "Good Samaritan." It is easy to be a little dazzled with oratory like Churchill's, but where is the parallel with the Samaritan who surely did a purely disinterested action without any hope of material gain? Mr. Churchill, making no bones about his hostility to communism, makes no pretence that his gesture is disinterested, being so obviously made because Britain and Russia are now fighting a common foe. Every blow to help Russia is also a blow for ourselves, so what boots it even if they were cannibals. Even a broad offer of help that never eventuated might considerably improve the morale (not morals!) of Russia, it nothing else.
I do not suggest that Mr. Hughes is not sincere, but he appears to draw parallels that will not bear scrutiny. Why not follow Churchill's outstanding example without sotto voce reservations that it does not include political or religious tolerance? It is possible to be too holy—especially if the house is on fire. A. P. Young.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19410705.2.29.2
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 24009, 5 July 1941, Page 8
Word Count
203CHURCHILL AS SAMARITAN New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 24009, 5 July 1941, Page 8
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.