THE MAORI WILL CASE.
[BY TELEGRAPH.—PRESS ASSOCIATION'.] WelliNT,to x, Th u rsday. Ix the Appeal Court, Mr. Haggitt, addressing the Judges on the Maori will case, submitted that Airini's document was not a legal will, as it made no mention of the devise of property. Judge Richmond remarked that the property might have been devised by implication. Counsel thought not, as in the first will the names of the persons as legatees had been mentioned. He submitted the document was, if anything, only a recommendation that Airini should be co-executor of the first will with Broughton, or possibly a recommendation to Broughton to consider favourably Airini and her relations. The Court adjourned until next day.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18881116.2.32
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXV, Issue 9213, 16 November 1888, Page 5
Word Count
115THE MAORI WILL CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXV, Issue 9213, 16 November 1888, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.