PREFERENCE CLAUSE
MUST NON-UNIONIST GO? [Per Press Association.] GISBORNE, Last Night. Owing to the indisposition of l\ir W. Scott, the employers’ representative of the Arbitration Court, tho Court adjourned to-day till this evening, when Mr Scott was still unable to be present. The Court sat In the evening, When It was asked to decide the application of a Gisborne employer, through the Inspector of Factories, for the interpretation of the .preference clause iu the Drivers’ Award. Tho question was: “Is an employer bound to dismiss from his service a youth who is a non-unionist, when requested to do so by the Union, provided there is a member of the union, either youth or adult, qualified for that particular work ?”
After argument had been heard, the Court reserved its decision.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19260330.2.29
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3308, 30 March 1926, Page 8
Word Count
129PREFERENCE CLAUSE Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3308, 30 March 1926, Page 8
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.