PLAY THE GAME.

Horowhenua Chronicle, 24 November 1937, Page 3

PLAY THE GAME.

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE CAN’T DIVIDE MORE WEALTH THAN IS PRODUCED (By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, Last Night A plea to both the employers and workers of New Zealand to “play the game ’ ’ one with the other and thus -maintain the industrial peace with resultant national prosperity was made by Hon. H. T. Armstrong, Minister of Labour, to-day. He was referring to the Arbitration Court system and the opportunity it gave for the peaceful settlement of industrial disputes. Hi? visit overseas and the opportunity it had given him of studying the systems used in other countries had, more than ever convinced him that the New Zea land system was the best in the world.

’“The more one sees of the strike method of settling disputes,” he said, ‘ ‘ the more one is in love with the present system of arbitration we have in this country. We -want a high standard of wages for the people of this country who are doing useful work and we want reasonable conditions of employment, but if wo are to maintain real prosperity wo cannot do it without work. Real wealth is produced by work. We want to inculcate it into the minds of the workers that it is economically impossible to divide more wealth than is produced.

£< Now that the new Court of Arbitration has been appointed, and it is likely that within a reasonable time the Courts will be able to catch up on the arrears of work, I want to make a final appeal to employers to play the game with their employees. On the other hand, I want to appeal to the workers to play the game with their employers. The man who thinks he can maintain good conditions by sitting back and not doing his share to make those conditions possible is making a big mistake. ’ ’ Mr. Armstrong said he was hoping for very good results from the new Court. The Judge was a man of long experience iu industrial law, particularly in compensation eases. Mr. W. E. Anderson, who had been nominated by the employers, was a man of wide experience in Court procedure and industrial matters generally, and Mr. A. W. Coskery, who would apparently represent the workers, was a man of long service in the Labour movement and one of the best-informed men in New Zealand on industrial law. Both Messrs Anderson and Croskery had figured prominently as advocates in the Arbitration Court and he was convinced the new Court would be a most efficient one.