Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GISBORNE APPEAL CASE.

CLAYTON v. CHAMBERS. [PER PRESS ASSOCIATION 1 WELLINGTON, July 31. ThPreserved judgment of the Court of Appeal in the ease Clayton v. Chambers was delivered this morning. The Court upheld the decision of Mr Justice Chapman in the Supreme Court. The Court held that they did not consider that Chambers, by agreeing to carry out a bargain with the East Coast Petroleum Company, ratified or approved of Clayton holding concessions in respect of which the action was brought for himself and further said : “We fail to see anything in his conduct in which he waived any rights he may have had against Clayton, either by his conduct or by resolution in which lie is said to have acquiescedThe appeal -was allowed, costs on the highest scale as from a distance.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19120801.2.25

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, 1 August 1912, Page 5

Word Count
133

GISBORNE APPEAL CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, 1 August 1912, Page 5

GISBORNE APPEAL CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, 1 August 1912, Page 5