IMPUDENT FRAUD
"LOOKING AFTER” HIS MONEY [Pr.u United Press Association.] WANGANUI, November 19. An interesting case, James Stuart v. Frank Hedgman, a claim for £1,024 for moneys advanced fiom time to time to be looked after by Hedgman, was concluded in the Supreme Court to-day before Mr Justice Reed. Judgment was entered for plaintiff for £826 14s lid, with costs The judge said he could not help remarking that it was an impudent fraud. In the evidence it was shown that Hedgman acted as a sort of adviser for Stuart, and got him to send from time to time his earnings, stating that he would look after them for him. Stuart could not get a statement of how bis affairs stood.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19261119.2.101
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 19410, 19 November 1926, Page 8
Word Count
121IMPUDENT FRAUD Evening Star, Issue 19410, 19 November 1926, Page 8
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.