CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 24, 28 July 1927, Page 17

CIVIL CASES

Judgment for plaintiffs by default, with costs, was given in. the following undetended civil cases, by Mr. W. G. Riddell, b.M., in the Magistrate's Court on Tuesday.

0. V. Whiteman v. W. White. £1 5sGordon and Gotch (Australasia), Ltd., v. M. Boyle (separate estate) , 10s; Lauchlau and Co. v. W. Delaney, £9 15 8 ; LauoMan ani.Co. v. C. Bartlctt,£l 10a; Charles William Brown v. J. Bruce, £10 10s: Wiustone, Ltd., v. L. W. Bradley, £10 14s 3d; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Kirkcaldie and Stains, Ltd., v. C. H. Harris (separate estate), £20 9s; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Osmond and Son (N.Z.), Ltd., v. J. G. Cooper, £4 17s 6d; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd and Osmond and Son (N.Z.), Ltd., v D* H. Marshall, £3 17s lOd; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Osmond aud .? n Sr; Z ->' Ltd-> v- A- Rennie, £3 15s 4d; Public Trustee, as administrator in the estate of Francis; Ed ward Shennan, v William Grant Franier, £10 11s; J M'llraith arid Co. v. V. Smith, £8 16s Od; British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., v. Crosbio Bros., 15s; Guy B. Lonnard v George Purdom and Eva Purdom (separate estate), costs only, £1 6s; Hamilton Nimmo and Sons, Ltd., v. T. A. Wrigley, £85 7s 6d; Fashions, Ltd., v. Albion Salon 4 254 S, ?d; T- and S- Supply Stores v. W Babm, £3 7s Od; British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., v. E. Clarke, £9 IBs; A. t>. Paterson and Co., Ltd., v. A. Thompson, £3 5s 8d; D.mnevirke Farmers' Meat Co. v. E. W. Johnston, £2 18s 8el; Dannevirke Farmers' Meat Co. v. S. B. Fairbrother, £4 17s 2d; Dannevirko Farmers' Meat Co. v. M. Morley (separate estate), £2 18s 7d; Moss Advertising Co., Ltd., v. G. H. Carson, £8; Moss Advertising Co., Ltd., v. W. J. Dally, £12; Moss Advertising Co., Ltd., v, W. Healey, £19; Moss Advertising. Co., Ltd., v. T. J Lethaby (Dunedin), £10; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and U.S. Rubber Co. (Aust.), Ltd., v. Lundy and Co., £48 ss.5 s. °d > -S"tt County Council v. Louisa Maud Wilton, (separate estate), £19 0s 2d; Ellen Lodge v. J. Dawson, £14 6s; Wellington City Council v. Percy Stewart, £8 12s 7d; Wellington City Council v. George Scott, £8 7s 3d; Wellington City Council v. Arthur Thomas Russell, £11 7s 4d; Wellington City Council v. Harold Rowntree, £10 11s 8d; Lauchlan and Co v Mrs. D. Gray . (separate estate), £1; Exhibitors' Alliance Films (N.Z.), Ltd , v H. V. Mawkes, £12 2s : 6d; Home Supply U>., Ltd., v, James A. Robins, £8 17s 6d; txide,Service Station v. J. Kerr, £4 2sLawrence and Hanson Electrical Co., Ltd v. J. A. Grofsky, £36 19s; Nestle and Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Co. (Aust.), Ltd-, y. J. R. Timson and Co., £17 10s 8d; Thompson Bros., Ltd., v. J. Allen (separate estate), £2 16s sd; G. A. Jesson v. James Frew, £17 10s; John Swinson Co., Ltd., v. E. J. Lane, £3 lfis Gd; D Lloyd Clay v. John William Jones, £9 18s 6d; A.B.C. Motors (N.Z.), Ltd., v W. J. Delaney, 16s; Leyland Motors, Ltd., v. B. Clearwater, £199 17s; Leyland Motors, Ltd.,: V.: C. W.-. Porter, £ 197-2s 8d; British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., v V. J. Reid, £23 Is lid: British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., v. L. Sigley, £1 17s; Lawrence and Hanson TSlectrical Co., Ltd v. Henderson and Brown, £25 Is 4d; Welhngton Gas Co., Ltd., v. Linklater knd Edwards, £8.