Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REJECTION OF THE BILL

MR. LONG'S MOTION. (Received April 1, 11. SO a.m.) LONDON, 31st March. Mr. W. IT. Long, in moving his motion for the rejection of the Home Rule Bill, said the discussion had been really a sham The Premier's proposals were j made for the purpose of securing a party advantage and not with a desire of settlement 7 . If the Government was unwilling to sacrifice the fruits of the Parliament .Act, which a General Election would entail, let it introduce an amending Bill.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19140401.2.78

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 77, 1 April 1914, Page 7

Word Count
87

REJECTION OF THE BILL Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 77, 1 April 1914, Page 7

REJECTION OF THE BILL Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 77, 1 April 1914, Page 7