Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ENGLAND'S VICTORY

BEATS SOUTH AFRICA BY 174 RUNS FOURTH TEST HATCH CONCLUDED 'LAST BATSMEN MAKE A FIGHT. ■y Xetagrapb.— Eus* Ae«od»ttßa.-»-Co|>jrJght. (ReoedTjed July H, 10 a^ LONDON, 10th, Jtfy. England tod the Fourth Test h, 174 -runs, South Africa, making 159 runs in »fche second' innings. ' The -weather vcas dnH, the attendance small, and the wicket easy. Tancred (38) and Pegler (12) Besomed to the bowling of Barnes aad Foster. Tapered, after adding a single, was clean-bowled by Barnes with the fifth ball of the first over. Eight for 110. Pegler and Garter (the newcomer) made a plucky stand. Hearne replaced Foster at 148, and' got Pegler in hie second over. Pegler had batted fifty-five ■ minutes for 32 runs. Nine for 159. Carter was bowled by Barnes in the next over, after having scored 31 by vigorous cricket. His total included five 4's. He was badly miased when 19. The South Africans' bowling was much better than at either Lord's or Manchester, bat their batting was weak. Details are as follow : — ENGLAND. First jpiyfnfli ... 242 Second kmmge ... ... ... ... 238 SOUTH AFRICA. First innings ... „. ... „, 147 Second Innings. H. W. Taylor, c Smith, b Fester ... 2 L. J. Tancred, b Barnes 39 G. White, candb Foster 17 C. B. Llewellyn, b Barnes 4 G. A. Faulkner, b Barnes 0 A. D. Nourse, c Foster, b Deam ... 16 L. Strieker, run out ... ... *.* 0 S. J. Snooke, b Dean | S. 'J. Pegler, b Hearne 32 C. P. Carter, b Barnes .„ ... 31 T. Ward, not out 0 Sundries— 3 no-balls, 5 leg-byes, 3 bye* ... <814 ... U Total ... v ., ... „. 159 Bowling Analysis. Overs. Mdns. Buns. Wkts. Barnes ... 21.2 5 63 4 ' Foster 23 4 51 2 Dean , 8 3 IS 2 Rhode* ... 4 1 14 0 Hearne „, Z 0 " 5 1 S. J. PEGLER The cabled report of England* second innings in the Second Test with South Africa last night stated that S. J. Pegler had obtained 100 wicketa during the present tour. Here they are: Derbyshire, two for 43; Surrey, two for 61 5 M.C.C., eleven for 119; Yorkshire, five for 80; Oxford University, four for 88; Worcestershire, nine for 74; Australia, sax for 105; Northamptonshire, four for 109 ; Surrey, four for 74 ; England, seven for 65; Notte, six for 138; Somerset, six for 65; South 1 Wales, eight for 112; Scotland, nine for 87 ; Middlesex, five for 37; Warwickshire, eight for 96; England (Second Test), sue for 222. Pegler's figures are 102 wicketa for I \&l5 runs — average 15.44. CRICKET IN SCOTLAND HOME SIDE SOUNDLY THBASHED. (Received July 11, 11.15 a.m.) 1 LONDON, 10th July. The Australians easily defeated Scotland/ after "declaring" with 225 for four. Details are as follow :— AUSTRALIA. First Innings 295 Second Innings.— Jennings 32, Mayne 44, Macartney 21, Minnett (not out) 65, \ Bardidey 45, Kelleway (not out), 9; sundries, 9. Total for four wickets ("dci clared"), 225. SCOTLAND. First Innings ... 173 Second Innings 52 Bowling Analysis.— Whitty six. for 22, Hazlitt three for 17, Minnett one for 7. NOItTHANTS LEADING FOR COUNTY CHAMPIONSHIP (Received July 11, 11.15 jl.hL) LONDON, 10th July. In county matches Cambridge beat Oxford by three wickets, and Northampton defeated Surrey by nine , wickete. Northampton is leading for county championship. DENTON (YORKSHIRE) SCORES 182 LONDON, 10th July. In the Yorkshire-Gloucestershire county fixture Denton scored 182. . WARNER SERIOUSLY ILL UNLIKELY TO PLAY DURING THE SEASON. LONDON, 10th July.' P. F. Warner, the well-known Inter* national cricketer, is seriously ill. He was confined to his bed last month from hemorrhage, due to a blow received I while practising at the nets at Lords. He is unlikely to play any more this seawn.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19120711.2.64

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXIV, Issue 10, 11 July 1912, Page 7

Word Count
602

ENGLAND'S VICTORY Evening Post, Volume LXXXIV, Issue 10, 11 July 1912, Page 7

ENGLAND'S VICTORY Evening Post, Volume LXXXIV, Issue 10, 11 July 1912, Page 7