NAVIGATION BILL. AN AUSTRALIAN MEASURE CRITICISED.
REVISION NEEDED. A BRITISH ASSOCIATION'S RESOLUTIONS. By Telegraph.— Press Association. — Copyright. (Receivod February 5, 9.0 a.m.) LONDON, 4th February. The council of the Mercantile Marine Service Association complains that the Australian Navigation Bill occasionally, but unwarrantably, interferes with the prerogatives of the Board of Trade. The council protests against section 369 of tho Bill and desires revision of the parts relating to courts of marine enquiry The clause provides that if a certificate has been cancelled by an Australian Court of Marine Enquiry, the fact that the certificate has been returned to the officer by tho Board of Trade on the authority which originally granted it — other than a court of appeal — shall not enable the eaid master or officer to serve on a ship in Australia, in the capacity specified in tha cancelled certificate.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19080205.2.66
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 30, 5 February 1908, Page 7
Word Count
141NAVIGATION BILL. AN AUSTRALIAN MEASURE CRITICISED. Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 30, 5 February 1908, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.