Mixed reaction to TV decision
PA Auckland The Government caucus decision to allow a new television channel run by private enterprise drew a mixed reaction yesterday from the three man contenders for a private warrant.
Northern Television, which has consistently promoted the concept of a regionally based third channel since it was set up three years ago, said it was delighted with the decision. Its competitors, Alternative Television Network and City Television, which have favoured a whole or partial take-over of TV2, were less enthusiastic. Both declared, however, that they would fight for a share of a third channel. Mr Neville Webber, a director of A.T.N., said that his company believed it would be difficult and costly to provide New Zealandwide regional coverage through a third network. However, the possibility
of a satellite link’s being available put a new complexion on the situation, he said.
Mr Webber said that A.T.N. had always made it clear if the Government favoured a regional third channel the proposal would be examined closely. “We are very interested and will be investigating the proposal,” he said. The C.T.V. managing director, Mr Don Hutchings, said a note of caution needed to be sounded. The Minister (of broadcasting) had invited the Broadcasting Tribunal to look into the third channel proposition.
“What he (the Minister) has actually announced is not the final equation for private broadcasting in this country.”
Mr Hutchings said the problems of a third channel had not yet been totally aired. The most difficult of these was the U.H.F. concept, which would require viewers to pay $2OO to $250
to convert television receivers. The manager of Northern Television, Mr Graeme Douglas, said N.T.V. had consistently maintained that a third channel was the only reasonable option for an extension of television in New Zealand. He was pleased that the Broadcasting Tribunal was being involved at this stage, as it had shown it had the experience and knowledge in broadcasting to sort out
the possible means of implementing the third channel proposal. Southern Television, Ltd, which wants to start a regional service in the South Island, was “very pleased” at the caucus decision, said a spokesman for the company, Mr R. A. Barker, in Christchurch yesterday. Mr Barker, who is also manager of the Christchurch Press Company, Ltd, saidd that it was obvious many points had to be de-
cided and many months would pass before the new service started to take shape, and that it was too early to comment in any detail on the decision.
However, Southern Television—which includes the Press Company, the “Ashburton Guardian,” the “Otago Daily Times,” and the “Southland times” in its shareholders—looked forward to participating in the development of a third channel, he said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19831209.2.44
Bibliographic details
Press, 9 December 1983, Page 4
Word Count
453Mixed reaction to TV decision Press, 9 December 1983, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.