Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Noxious Animals Bill

Sir, — I am not a hunter. Nor could I condone trespassing and deer poaching. But I regarded with amazement the report (“The Press,” August 20) on the trespass section of the Noxious Animals Bill. Two

basic tenets of British justice are overturned in ihe bill with a horrifying lack of concern. In this legislation, a person is now held guiltv. whatever the circumstances, until he can prove himself innocent. Furthermore, his home is no longer his castle and his privacy may be violated by forestry officials without a warrant. It takeno great effort to imagine situations in which overzealous Forestry Service officers and runholders impose their judge and jury ac on innocent people. Surely alternative means of removing the incentives to trespass and poaching can be found without infringing the rights of the individual, and creating precedents whose disastrous long-term effects outweigh their immediate, superficial, objectives. — Yours, etc., A. R. HEATH. Fairlie. August 22, 1977. j

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770827.2.131.8

Bibliographic details

Press, 27 August 1977, Page 14

Word Count
159

Noxious Animals Bill Press, 27 August 1977, Page 14

Noxious Animals Bill Press, 27 August 1977, Page 14