Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Shooting From The Air

Sir,—l wish to refute a statement allegedly made by me at the meeting of the North Canterbury Deerstalkers’ Association on June 22, and published in “The Press” on June 24. Clause 3 of the association’s strict code of ethics reads: “Respect the property of others.” Any proven breach of this would be punishable by expulsion from the association as well as, of course, by law. It is regrettable that a reporter should resort to changing legitimate discussion into a shock statement to impress his readers. This type of reporting tends to discourage organisations from having the press present at their meetings.—Yours, etc.,

G. W. McQUEEN. June 29, 1967. [We regret that our report of the meeting of the North Canterbury branch of the New Zealand Deerstalkers’ Association incorrectly attributed to Mr McQueen a remark made by some one else. Our reporter asked the chairman to identify the speakers at the close of the meeting; and we are satisfied that there was a misunderstanding. We are also satisfied that in other respects the report was a fair and accurate precis of a long discussion.—Ed., “The Press.”]

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670630.2.107.6

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31409, 30 June 1967, Page 10

Word Count
189

Shooting From The Air Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31409, 30 June 1967, Page 10

Shooting From The Air Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31409, 30 June 1967, Page 10