Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MATRICULATION HISTORY

Sir,—M. Hall ignores my main point. Current events should certainly be taught, but a history paper should not demand such knowledge of them. Nor did I “complain about the inclusion of twentieth century questions”; I complained about their inclusion in the proportion of eight to five. Early this year every teacher of matriculation history said something like: “What you have chiefly to learn is British history in the nineteenth century”; justifiably, as M. Hall might discover through reading the syllabus. I know one secondary school where post-1918 history received no attention and post-1900 no great amount. Pupils from this school and probably others, had very little choice; and at least half their year’s work was wasted. M. Hall has clearly no conception of what great nineteenth century questions are taught; and cannot challenge my assertion that this is a paper, not in history, but in current events,—Yours, etc., HISTORY STUDENT. December 9, 1942.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19421212.2.60.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 6

Word Count
155

MATRICULATION HISTORY Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 6

MATRICULATION HISTORY Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 6