RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

Press, Volume XII, Issue 1586, 6 December 1867, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

CiißiSTCHtracH—December 5. [Before C. C. Bo wen, Esq., E.M.] P. Maguire was charged with being drunk and incapable, and also with failing to appear to his recognizances. Prisoner waa fined £2. James McGill was charged with being drunk and disorderly- Constable McCalinan paid he found prisoner drunk and very dieorderly. He waa: obliged to handcuff him.; Two witnesses corroborated the const&ble'e testimony, and his Worship fined prisoner £2, with a warning that if he appeared again for drunkenness he would be severely dealt with. William Myler, for being drunk and incapable, was discharged in consideration of its being bis firat offence. '

A considerable number of persons Wera fined for breaches of the Cattle Tre<nn Ordinance. ' 33 F. 11. M. Wnlkcr, Trustee r.r Dr T, ; ,, hull. Estate, and Dr D-juner r Hart—CUim ,! profesaiomil services rendered. I)«f,>n<l. I suid ho did not send for the pkintifF I) IlilFo wns uttending a scrvmt of hu '; -lied i« Dr. Dcamer. Ho thought it. would nil have h..,> n i m -\ n \J ' Dr. llirtVs account. Hi a Wnr ß hip e ' ai « defendant was aware tlmt Dr. Hiiro Wfw ■»„;„ to call in another medical man | l 0 *.» r S / Or tho a,n 1 0, ? n - Judgment fo r * pla;ntitl s tor amount, cluuned. The Snine f H-^iuk-Defendant p l Pa .i 0 , n B *l- off J" 0, Joneto her property h J Dr Turnbulis horse when the doctor * attending a lady at defendant's home ir" Worship said he could not n.iuiit, the set nff Defendant must euo Dr. Turnbull for t) damage. Judgment for plaintiffs. The Same t>. J. H. Niemann— DefontW admitted the claim, but said he had no m«l Judgment for plaintiffs. can,, The Same t>. Furby-Dofendant pleaded * set-off for work done. It appeared that rt, work done was on Dr. Turnbull's nrirlfl account. Judgment was given for plaiatSk for amount claimed. r wa The Same t>. Moir—Defendant dispute portion of the claim. Judgment f OP { )hi £J for full amount. l mt The Same i>. Falloon-Defendant disputed some of the items in the account. Caae r? journed for further evidence. ' The Same t>. Kerr-The defendant paid £5 into Court, and pleaded that eomeirf the charges were exce ß sive Ca ßo ndjouj for a week for furthor evidence The Same v. H. C. Wee't.— Defendantobjected to a charge of £3 3s, made for attend ing hie wife in confinement, as he had t> viouely been charged only £2 2s J)!" Denmer eaid the reason of that waa becau.*' the first time he attended the wife defendJf wa« a labourer, but the Inst time lie Was tradesman. Judgment was given for py/ tilTs for amount claimed. The City Council t>. M. R. ThoopSfm Claim for rates. Defendant said ho wij 0 i asked for the rate a few days since. ment for plaintiffe. c " Rhodes and Wilkin v. Mjln—This ewe W been adjourned for the evidence of defendant's wife. Judgment waa given for plaintiffs. Leathamu Foster—Claim for £1-3. Defendant had paid £10 into Court. Judgment was given for £11 Oa 6d. Morton v. Oswald—Claim for rent. This case had been adjourned. The defendant pleaded a set off, which was not allowed, and judgment was given for plaintiff for amount claimed.