SUPERANNUATION.

Auckland Star, Volume LXV, Issue 277, 22 November 1934, Page 6

SUPERANNUATION.

In reply to Mr. John Caughlev 011 the above subject, I would like to say that the fact that even in prosperous times the Government found itself unable, or unwilling, to contribute the full amount agreed upon, only goes to show what a lopsided bargain their superannuation ibusiness lias been from the beginning. What we all object to now is that the Government superannuitants. have not been called upon to do their "whack" during these desperate times. All other contracts have been ruthlessly broken and all those thrifty people who by their own savings have provided "superannuation" for themselves have had their incomes drastically reduced by speeial Acts of Parliament. Is the retired Btatc superannuitants' contract any more sacred than that of other people? What reason is there why State employees should be pensioned off at comparatively early ages largely' at the country's expense? Are these civil servants of greater importance or .benefit to the country than the average wagee-arncr or business man? During their working years they have continuous employment at good salaries and perform their duties under the best of conditions. The public should demand that while legislative restrictions apply to rents, interest, dividends, wages, etc.. the allowances to retired Government employees should also be subjected to a "cut." JOHN CITIZEN.