AWARD EXEMPTION
HOSPITAL BOARD SECRETARY. ASHBURTON CASE DECIDED. CHRISTCHURCH, This Day. “We rule that nothing in the award applies to tire accountant to the Ashburton Hospital Board,” said Mr Justice Tyndall, concluding an oral judgment in the Court of Arbitration yesterday, interpreting an exemption clause in the Canterbury Local Bodies’ Clerical Award. The case was argued before the Court on Monday, by Mr T. Nuttall for the union, and Mr H. F. Butland for the Canterbury Employers’ Association. Mr S. E. McGregor ./watched proceedings for the Inspector of Awards. During the hearing, Mr McGregor explained that the board contended that it was entitled to exemption in respect of its accountant. The union claimed that the exemption provided in the award applied only to a small local' body which could not pay its only executive officer £350 a year. The board’s staff comprised a secretary receiving more than £350, an accountant receiving the full senior wage, but less than £350, and a typist. Mr Nuttall said that the interpretation sought by the employers conflicted with the intention of both parties at tlre t Conciliation Council held before the award was first made. The award provided exemption for workers receiving £350 or more a year, or one senior worker, in the case of each local body, provided suclr worker (if a full time officer) received in cash or its equivalent at least the minimum wage provided in the award. It was recognised by the union that many small local bodies, without the exemption sub-clause, would have to have a single officer, whom they were unable to pay £350, covered by the award. This would restrict them to some extent, whereas their wealthier contemporaries would not be so bound. His Honour said in his judgment that the Court was inclined to agree with Mr Nuttall’s contention that when the clause was originally drafted the parties had principally in mind the smaller local authorities which did not employ any worker at £350 a year or more, and that the exemption was probably intended to be limited to these special cases. However, the Court had to take the clause as it stood, and was convinced that it could not be given such a limited interpretation. The phrase “each local body” could only mean “each local body bound by the award.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19410807.2.61
Bibliographic details
Ashburton Guardian, Volume 61, Issue 253, 7 August 1941, Page 8
Word Count
385AWARD EXEMPTION Ashburton Guardian, Volume 61, Issue 253, 7 August 1941, Page 8
Using This Item
Ashburton Guardian Ltd is the copyright owner for the Ashburton Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Ashburton Guardian Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.