BUILDING AGREEMENT
DEFINITION OF ‘ OUTSIDE GOSTS.'
(Per Press Association). WELLINGTON, May 31. An interpretation of the words “outside costs” in an agreement for the building of certain premises in Hastings was given by the Chief Justice (the lit. Hon. Sir Michael Myers) in the Supreme Court to-day. Plaintiffs were Trevor Bros., contractors, and defendants Westerman and Co., drapers. The question was whether the words applied to the costs of employers or the costs of contractors. His Honor’s decision was in favour of the latter. The owners stipulated that the total net cost could not exceed £11,291, which was the same figure as the previously mentioned figure of outside costs. To read them as meaning outside gross costs would involve the necessity of entirely disregarding the word “net” wherever it occurred in the portion of the agreement which his Honor had quoted.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19340601.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ashburton Guardian, Volume 54, Issue 196, 1 June 1934, Page 3
Word Count
141BUILDING AGREEMENT Ashburton Guardian, Volume 54, Issue 196, 1 June 1934, Page 3
Using This Item
Ashburton Guardian Ltd is the copyright owner for the Ashburton Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Ashburton Guardian Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.