Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FIG. 2. EFFECT OF SEED DUSTS ON TOMATO-SEEDLING DAMPING-OFF. Box A contained untreated soil inoculated with Pythium ultimum, while boxes B and C contained farm soil naturally infected with this fungus: A, seed, dusted with “Ceresan”; B, untreated seed; seed dusted with copper carbonate. [Photo by H. Drake.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZJAG19370621.2.2.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 54, Issue 6, 21 June 1937, Page 326

Word Count
48

FIG. 2. EFFECT OF SEED DUSTS ON TOMATO-SEEDLING DAMPING-OFF. Box A contained untreated soil inoculated with Pythium ultimum, while boxes B and C contained farm soil naturally infected with this fungus: A, seed, dusted with “Ceresan”; B, untreated seed; seed dusted with copper carbonate. [Photo by H. Drake. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 54, Issue 6, 21 June 1937, Page 326

FIG. 2. EFFECT OF SEED DUSTS ON TOMATO-SEEDLING DAMPING-OFF. Box A contained untreated soil inoculated with Pythium ultimum, while boxes B and C contained farm soil naturally infected with this fungus: A, seed, dusted with “Ceresan”; B, untreated seed; seed dusted with copper carbonate. [Photo by H. Drake. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 54, Issue 6, 21 June 1937, Page 326