SUPREME COURT.

Waikato Times, Volume 109, Issue 18344, 2 June 1931, Page 2

SUPREME COURT.

NEXT WEEK’S SESSION. SEVERAL SERIOUS CHARGES. LIGHT CIVIL LIST. The Supreme Court resumes at Hamilton next Monday, June 8. There are six criminal cases for trial, including one for alleged murder and one for alleged attempted murder. The civil list is not as lengthy as usual, comprising nine cases only in which damages are claimed. There are eleven divorce petitions for hearing, one of which is defended. Three cases on appeal are set down, and discharges from bankruptcy in seven cases will be sought. Civil Cases. Before a Judge and Jury of twelve. — Hector John Carseldine v. E. W. 6. Le Quesne, £1685 2s damages alleged negligence. Before a Judge alone. —Mabel Rowley Palmer v. The Royal Insurance Company Limited, claim for £ISOO, amount allegedly due under policy; T. H. Glass v. W. S. Anderson, £SOO damages for alleged slander; Edith Halford v. New Zealand Insurance Company, Ltd., £506 16s 6d, amount allegedly due under policy, (counterclaim for an ■ order declaring benefits under policy forfeited and another policy null and void); Lettice Constance Christophers v. Charles Bernard Christophers, 'specific performance counterclaim for accounts and rectification of agreement; Michael James Wilson v. Martin Heywood Ilampson, £169 18s damages for alleged negligene; Bruce Scott v. Florence McCracken, speciflo performance or £IOOO, damages for alleged breach of contract, Counterclaim for recission; Otahuhu Amusements Limited v. Union Theatres Limited and Otahuhu Theatre Company Limited, £I4OO, balance of purchase money and specific performance; Robert Clive Tuke v. William Seymour Brunsklll, £2737, recission of contract to r sale of land and damages. Divorces. Before a Judge alone. —Muriel Anna Marshall v. Alexander Turner Marshall, alleged desertion; Charles James Asplin v. Salome Elizabeth Asplin, alleged failure to comply with a decree for restitution; Geoffrey Day Gatland v. Olive Elizabeth May Catland, alleged failure to comply with a decree for restitution; Elizabeth Ann Tanner v. Jesse Tanner, separation; Victor Foster Cray v. Mildred Mary Cray, separation; Gwendolyn Lilian Stewart v. Wallace Stewart, separation; Ella Marjorie Frank v. Henry Walter Frank, alleged desertion; Roso Lavinia llornblow v. Robert Edward Hornblow, separation; defended, . Joseph Little v. Isabella Little, alleged desertion; Walter Flintoff v. Millicicnt iMMio Flintoff, alleged adultery; Harold Francis Adams v. Dorothy May ■Adams, restitution of conjugal rights. In Banco. Farmers' Co-operative Auctioneering 7'Ljmlted, v. J. Grayden, case ■'on' appeal"; M., C. McMullen v. The ■ Farmers’ CO-operative Auctioneering Gbmpany Ltd., case on appeal;-R. G. Altken v. D.’ Shaw, case on appeal. In Bankruptcy. • The : following bankrupts will apply for discharge:—■ George Henry Bruce Rogers, Eric Troutbeck Hutton, Walter Thorp, Albert Victor Middlebrook, Thomas Hamilton, John Morris Scott, William David Rennie.