Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RIOT AFTERMATH

THREE MORE CONVICTIONS BY WELLINGTON MAGISTRATE (Per Press Association) WELLINGTON, Last Night. Three more men were convicted in the Police Court to-day by Mr E. Page, S.M., on charges arising out of the window-smashing incidents on Tuesday, May 10. Decision -was reserved in one case, and two others were dismissed on tho ground that their identity had not been definitely proved. One man admitted being in possession of a tin of pepper, but maintained that he was carrying this purely as a defensive weapon. This was the case tho Magistrate deferred for consideration.

The offences proved were of a very serious nature, and ptrnaities were more lenient than in the earlier eases.

JNbrman a drainlaycr, aged 36, was acquitted of a ch&ruo of having broken the windows of W. H. Lloyd, a jeweller, in Lambton Quay, the Magistrate holding that the police had not established identification. William George Lovatt, a seaman, aged 26, charged with breaking the windows of the premises of David Dalton and Celine Rodgers, was also given the benefit of the doubt.

Charles Maurice Brooks, a labourer, aged 36, was remanded until Wednesday next in order to allow the Magistrate to consider the evidence proffered in a charge that he was armed, with an offensive weapon with a felonious intent. The weapon consisted of a tin of pepper which the accused said he carried as a defensive and not as an offensive weapon against special constables.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WPRESS19320521.2.30

Bibliographic details

Waipukurau Press, Volume XXVIII, Issue 125, 21 May 1932, Page 5

Word Count
241

RIOT AFTERMATH Waipukurau Press, Volume XXVIII, Issue 125, 21 May 1932, Page 5

RIOT AFTERMATH Waipukurau Press, Volume XXVIII, Issue 125, 21 May 1932, Page 5