A CLAIM FOR ARCHITECT'S COMMISSION.
♦ ! T. B. Jacobsen v- J. Brennan. The following evidence wa» taken after *d Vbilt to jirt's feitVtSaf :— William Hogg, carpenter, said he caw Jacobsen frequently on the job, nearly every day j he never saw him the worse for liquor; he had seen Davis the worse for liquor. Jacobsen supplied all detailo of the work and advised Davis; he bel ; eved that bad the plans been carried ' out the building would have been greatly j - improved in its appearance; did not think ! Davis could have carried out the work I without Jacobsen's, or his (witness*) assi»t?nce. John Kay, bricklayer, said he had had . experience on large works at Home, and had carried out the works at the Wanganui Hospital. He had never so many detail drawingß shown so explicitly at Homo for a similar building. He considered that the kitchen chimney could have been carried oat as specified ; there were footings under the foundations; the boarding round the cellar was not removed too quioUy. The cause of the c&llar wall cracking was the mud being placed behind it. The two inohea overapping on the adjoining section could have been cut off without detriment ; it would hare cost about £1 to do it. CroSi-eramined— He tendered for the works under the plans; he found no fault I with the plans ; and had there been he would have told Jacobson. ( John Brown, bricklayer, corroborated * the evidence of the previous witneae. Alfred Atkins, architect, recalled, said the chimney could have been carried out according to Jacobson's plnnß; there rrere footings in the cellar floor. Jn'rna Taylor, labourer, said that be j nnd heard Jacobsen quarrelling wilb Brennan about the mud being put bflhind the wall : Brennan interfored with Jacobsen. Cross-examined— He was only two days ou the works ; he had to leave owing to illness ; he was standing on the footpith, after leaving the job, when he heard tho qua-rro' about tho mud. T. McLachlan, carpenter and joiner, said ho bad measured the building with Jacobsen ; it was 68ft Sin, instnad of 68ft; bad known Davis to have made a number of mistaken. He had not seen Jaoobaon the worse for liquor. Cross-examined— One mistaVo wa3 in the roof ; the rafters were either too long or too short, be could not say which ; he considered it would take more than a day to rectify tbat uiistikp. John Jonee, bricklayer, said be bad erected the chimneys, and could have carried out tbo kitchen chimney br in pan; there were footings' under the cellar foundation ; ho was five months on the building ; Jacobsen always conducted himself in a propw manner j he bad seen Jacobsen frequently on tbe buildinp; Jacobson supplied him with details of chimney caps ; these were not carried out; had do complaint to make about pUns. The case was adjourned nnt'l 9 80 on Friday morning.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH18961022.2.37
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 8989, 22 October 1896, Page 4
Word Count
479A CLAIM FOR ARCHITECT'S COMMISSION. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 8989, 22 October 1896, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.