MAKING MUNITIONS
MR. BURN REPLIES TO MINISTER OFFER IN NOV EMBER. WELLINGTON, July 31. “The reply made by the Minister of Supply, Mr. Sullivan, to my statement published on Monday in no way explains why New Zealand has not produced a single weapon of defence or offence, excepting .303 ammunition and training aircraft, since war was declared almost 12 months ago” said Mr. R. Burn, managing director of the Precision Engineering Company, Ltd., yesterday. “Nor does it explain why engineering establishments, railway workshops and motor assembly plants in New Zealand have reduced staffs when England has been working three shifts seven days a week, and Australia and Canada are doing their utmost to emulate this magnificent effort. And, may I add, indulgence in personalities will not remedy this unfortunate position. “I repeat that existing engineering establishments are, and have been since the outbreak of war, capable, in skill of men and range of plant, of producing a considerable variety of munitions. “I repeat also, in spite of the earlier statement having been characterised as nonsense: That Stokes mortars and shells, grenades, gun carriers, motor-cars, lawn mowers, washing machines, builders and plumbers’ hardware are (11 made from the same basic materials (i.e., ferrous and non-ferrous metals and alloys); (2) fabricated by the same tradesmen (toolmakers, tradesmen, machinists and process workers); (3) by the same methods and on the same machines (lathes, millers, drillers, shapers, slotters, planers, grinders and presses); (4) to the same degree of accuracy (Newalls or B.E.S.A. Standards) ; and that the only difference is in their physical shape. Lack of Vision Alleged. “Mr. Sullivan's tirade against me personally in no way explains away the obstruction, or lack of vision perhaps, or his departmental officers in refusing to take advantage of the offer made to the secretary of the Department of Industries and Commerce, Mr. L. J. Schmitt, by a representative deputation of Wellington engineers in November last—nine months ago—that such establishments should 'tool up’ and make patterns and jigs for certain types of munitions fully within their capabilities so that if the necessity arose production could be commenced without delay. That is. the proposal was that the New Zealand engineering establishments should prepare themselves on the basis of the shadow factory plan of Britain or of the annexes In Australia. “Had that proposal been met in the • spirit in which it was made there I would not to-day be the deplorable I delay in getting into production on ' such essential munitions as rifle grenI ades, Stokes guns and Stokes shells. “Further, had the otter of co-opera-tion in planning and preparation then tendered been accepted, the almost unbelievable position which was disclosed before the Industries Committee under the chairmanship of Mr. J. Hodgens, M.P., on June 13, could not have arisen. “On that date it was admitted tc I the representatives of the engineering i industry present that though a comprehensive list of munitions immediately required had been drawr up there existed in New Zealandnine months after the outbreak o war and seven months after the in dustry had made its offer of full coI operation—plans and specifications in . respect of one item only. That item was mess tins.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19400801.2.70
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 84, Issue 179, 1 August 1940, Page 7
Word Count
529MAKING MUNITIONS Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 84, Issue 179, 1 August 1940, Page 7
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.