Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOLF

MARTON AND SEAFIELD INTER-CLUB MATCH The weather conditions were ideal for the inter-club match between Marton and Seafield on hte Seafield links over the week-end. Marton’s team, although small in numbers, was fully representative of their club and put up a good light, Seafield narrowly winning by one game in the four-balls in the morning and by the same margin in the singles in the afternoon. Appended are the results, Marton players being mentioned first:— Four-Ball Matches M. C. Fenwicke and G. Bevan won from E. Shirriffs and R. Haworth. N. D. Anderson and R. FullertonSmith won from P. D. England and C. G. Young. G. Moffett and 11. W. Collier lost to R. D. Smart and B. Jones. A. Fullerton-Smith and R. McKenzie won from G. Coull and E. Runnerstrum. F. L. Young and Marshall lost to P. McDonald and Roi Goss. Netherclift and Kingdon lost to S Pritchard and E. G. Gilbert. Bryant and Bryant lost to H. Hcan and T. Hackshaw. Totals.—Seafield 4 games, Marton 3 games. Singles M. C. Fenwicke won from F. Shirriffs. G. Bevan won from R. Haworth. N. Alderson lost to P« D. England. L. Fullerton-Smith won from C. G. Young. G. Moffett lost to B. Jones. H. AV. Collier lost to R. D. Smart. A. Fullerton-Smith won from G. Coull. R. McKenzie won from E. Runnerstrum. F. L. Young halved with R. Cuthbertson. Marshall lost to S. Pritchard. Nertherclift lost to G. Laffey. Kingdon lost to D. Flower. Bryant lost to H. Hean. Bryant won from T. Hackshaw. Totals.—Seafield 7 games, Marton 6 games. THE GAME AT HOME CHAMPIONSHIP AT LEEDS [ Australian Press Assn. ] Received May 20, 5.5 p.m. LONDON, May 19. In the women’s golf championship final Miss C. Blan beat Miss Marshall 3 up and 2 to play. In the Leeds championship semifinals, C. A. Whiteombe beat Barber 1 up. Jolly boat Roxburgh, 4 up and 3 In the final C. A. Whiteombe beat Jolly 3 up and 2 to play. GOLDEN REMINDERS AN ANTIDOTE FOR SLICING. (Specially written for the “Chronicle” by Harry Yard on, Six Times Open Champion.) Not long ago, I met a very good golfer in an ecstasy about his game — always a pleasant thing to do, because good golfers are apt to become miserable if they miss two or three drives in a round, whereas the ordinary mortal is deliriously happy if he hits two or three nice ones. This particular individual was effervescing with joy because he had discovered a golden remedy for a longstanding tendency to slice his shots. It consisted in turning the toes of his left foot inwards in the stance —just as a pigeon does —and lo! the effects were wonderful. Ho declared that this expedient braced up the left side of his body so strongly as to bring the clubface square to the ball at the impact and check a habit which he had developed of coming in too slackly for the blow and cutting across the ball. People are constantly lighting upon discoveries which, seizing the imagination, act temporarily as cures for ills to which the golfing flesh is heir. No doubt many of them depend largely upon faith for their effect, and, sooner or later, they are usually abandoned by their originators. The problem is to sort the good from the merely plausible.

The scheme of standing pigeon-toed as an antidote for slicing may have something to recommend it. Mr Cyril Tolley was its pioneer. He introduced it several years ago, and for a time prospered exceedingly on it. He adopted this stance when, in 1924, he won the French open championship at Versailles with rounds of 73, 73, 71 and 73, beating Walter Hagen by three strokes. He has since forsaken it, but that does not mean that it is without its value as a transient remedy and confidence-reviver. A Putting Inspiration. It is only from such experimentations that methods of definite and lasting value to the golfer are evolved. A case in point is the system of reversing the ordinary overlapping grip for putting. As every player knows—or ought to know —the normal overlapping grip is so arranged that the little finger of the right hand rests on the forefinger of the left. I think it was Mr W. J. Travis, of New York, winner of our amateur championship in 1904, who introduced the plan of reversing this order for the putting grip by placing the forefinger of the. left hand on the little finger of the right. His theory was that the left hand became a guide which enabled the right—the hand which actually made the stroke—to take the club-face back straight behind the ball and square all the while to the intended line of the putt. Wondrously though he putted, people were inclined for many years to regard Mr Travis’ grip as a little eccentricity which made him a law unto himself, but it is the fact that nearly all the leading American golfers, beginning with Mr Bobby Jones, now have faith in it. It is accepted by everybody who is in a position to judge that the Americans are more deadly and more consistent than the British at putting, and, since there must be some explanation of this state of affairs, it is not unreasonable to suggest that the Americans may have the better system. Of that system one of the most notable features is.the adoption of the reversed •overlapping grip for the putter. Yet it is almost unknown here. The only other outstanding trait in k the American way of holding out is to dispose the arms so that the elbows are pointing outwards, thus creating a con-

dition in which the club can be swung to and fro, like a pendulum. This, being the more conspicuous feature, has a good many adherents in Britain; but it is at least possible that the unobtrusive peculiarity of grip has as much as anything to do with the success o£ the Americans in the most delicate department of the game. Happy-Go-Lucky Putting. It is one of the curious aspects of golf in this country that there never has been any nationally accepted method of putting, nor any prescribed way of teaching it. For the drive, the iron shot, the inashie shot, the niblick recovery from places of retribution, and, indeed, all the strokes up to the green—there have been definitely established forms of instruction. Putting has been left to look after itself. Hundreds of thousands of players have had their countless hours of instruction in drives and iron shots and approaches, but one might search far and long without finding anybody who had had one solid hour of teaching in the art of putting. The late Tom Ball, who was a remarkably good putter, did once tell me of a patron who engaged him to travel from London to St. Andrews to give three lessons of an hour each in his special line. There is obviously something wrong in this state of affairs. Is it the lack of a national cult in putting? Even the small, select band of champions and other first-class players arc to be seen shaping in every conceivable position for their putts —sorne^ standing nearly bolt upright, and others stooping with their noses nearly touching the ball; some straddle-legged, and others with their heels nearly touching. It might not be a bad idea if some representative British team, either a Walker Cup team or a Ryder Cup team, were to confer and decide upon a definite method of putting.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19280521.2.70

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20151, 21 May 1928, Page 8

Word Count
1,261

GOLF Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20151, 21 May 1928, Page 8

GOLF Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20151, 21 May 1928, Page 8