Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PRIVY COUNCIL

DOMINIONS’ AFFAIRS DETENTION CF BIGHT TO APPEAL Beceived March 6. 11.30 p.m. LONDON, March 6. Professor J. H. Morgan, professor of Constitutional Law at University College, London, lecturing on the judical committee of the Privy Council, described the committee’s reports as “the t easury of the Empire’s common law.” The committee, being non-parochial, treated each Dominion as a law unto itself, he declared. The day had gone by when the Imperial Government would oppose the restriction or even abolition of an appeal when a Dominion so demanded. For example, Australia’s limitation of appeal was a constitutional interpretation. Personally he was convinced that a plebiscite of the Empire would overwhelmingly favour tho retention of appeals.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19270307.2.41

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 19784, 7 March 1927, Page 7

Word Count
117

THE PRIVY COUNCIL Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 19784, 7 March 1927, Page 7

THE PRIVY COUNCIL Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 19784, 7 March 1927, Page 7