A Sydney cricket match provided a minor umpiring puzzle the other day. A bowler warned the batsman that he was going to toss him up an “ underarm.” The batsman made no objection, and up the sugar-doodle went. The umpire called no-ball. There is nothing to justify his verdict in the laws save the discretion allowed in Rule 48 to call “ no-ball ” if an umpire is not satisfied of the absolute fairness of any delivery. In this case the delivery was fair and the batsman was forewarned, so the discretion was strained. A LIFE OF MISERY. Why endure a life of misery with Rheumatism? Try out R-U-R. It has brought relief to thousands. Scores of New Zealand testimonials. Your money refunded if you are not satisfied with results. You will be the sole judge. Ask for Free Booklet from E. Cameron Smith’s, Chemists, or Barnetts’, Chemists.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19340407.2.146.1
Bibliographic details
Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20274, 7 April 1934, Page 14
Word Count
145Page 14 Advertisements Column 1 Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20274, 7 April 1934, Page 14
Using This Item
Star Media Company Ltd is the copyright owner for the Star (Christchurch). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Star Media. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.