Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

United Tress Association—Por Electric T clegraph—Copyright. Received 9.14 a.m., May Ist. LONDON, April 30. Sir Michael Hicks-Beacli, in reply to Sir E. F. Flower, in .the House of Commons, stated that a rebate on colonial sugar was impracticable, inasmuch as it was impossible to estimate the quantity of sugar, not really colonial, imported from the colonies. The Committee of Ways and Moans renewed the duty on, spirits. The Loan Bill was carried by 213 to 148. The House adopted the report of ftho Committee which agreed to the sugar duties and also adopted the report of the Committee agreeing to increase the income tax. Sir M. Hicks-Beach declared that the issue of the whole war loan was most advantageous, and had not disturbed the market, but tended to improve other securities.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19010502.2.12

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume LXIV, Issue 3557, 2 May 1901, Page 2

Word Count
133

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. Timaru Herald, Volume LXIV, Issue 3557, 2 May 1901, Page 2

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. Timaru Herald, Volume LXIV, Issue 3557, 2 May 1901, Page 2