APPEAL COURT.

Taranaki Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 144134, 2 July 1913, Page 6

APPEAL COURT.

A BOOKMAKER’S CASE.

Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, July J. Continuing argument in the case Ross v Cassells, Mr. Myers submitted that tho word “Publish” must mean to make known to tho, public at large, and did not (refer to -a case ot publication to a single individual. He cited authorities in support of this argument. Tho Court intimated that it was satisfied tliat tho race card was sent. by appellant in response to a request by Cassells. , , , Mr. Ostler, for the Crown, contended* that tho document in question was a circular intended for dissemination amongst the public generally, and that the publication to ono person was sufficient. Air. Neave briefly replied, and the Court reserved its decision.