APPEAL COURT.
A BOOKMAKER’S CASE.
Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, July J. Continuing argument in the case Ross v Cassells, Mr. Myers submitted that tho word “Publish” must mean to make known to tho, public at large, and did not (refer to -a case ot publication to a single individual. He cited authorities in support of this argument. Tho Court intimated that it was satisfied tliat tho race card was sent. by appellant in response to a request by Cassells. , , , Mr. Ostler, for the Crown, contended* that tho document in question was a circular intended for dissemination amongst the public generally, and that the publication to ono person was sufficient. Air. Neave briefly replied, and the Court reserved its decision.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19130702.2.66
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 144134, 2 July 1913, Page 6
Word Count
119APPEAL COURT. Taranaki Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 144134, 2 July 1913, Page 6
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.