Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NEW PLYMOUTH v. WAITARA.

There was a difference of fifty-three games in tho totals of this match.' Tho local men were victorious in both singles and doubles, hut it was in tho ladies’ matches and the combined doubles that Now Plymouth lost ground. In the following scores New Plymouth players are mentioned first: — Men’s Singles.—Thompson 9 v. Harrison 5; webtor 9 v. Brocklohurst 7; I. Grant 9 v. Passau 0; Homo 9 v. Allen 2; Matthews 9 v. Smith 1; Heighten 9 y. Letts 8. Ladies’ Singles.—Miss Berry 5 v. Mrs. Matthews 7; Miss King sv. Miss Purdie 7; Miss Loatham 7 v. Miss Bndley 1; Miss Crawford 7 v. Miss Barley 5. Men’s Doubles. —Thompson and Webster 12 v. Harrison and Brocklohurst 2 ; Homo and Grant 12 v. Passau and Allen 8; Heighten and Matthews 12 v. Smith and Letts 10. Ladies’ Doubles.—Misses Berry and King 5 v. Mrs. Matthews and Mis-s Pnrdio 7; Misses Loatham and Crawford 7 v. blisses Badley and Bayley 4. Combined Doubles. —Thompson and Miss King 8 v. Harrison and Mrs Matthews SI; Webster and Miss Berry 9.v. Brocklohurst and Miss-Purdie 8; Grant and Miss Crawford 9 v. Passau and Miss Bayley 8 ; Home and M iss Leatbam 9 v. Allen and Miss Badley 3. Totals. —New Plymouth 101; AVaitara 108. FITZBOY v. AV.V.M.I. For this match the Stratford Club sent a strong learn, whilst the local club was not represented to its full strength. The match, however, was keenly fought, as the following scores show (Stratford players mentioned first); — Ladies’ Singles.—Miss Tichbon 6 v. Miss Potior 2; Miss Wilson 6 v. Miss Hurlc 2; Miss Mackay 6 v. Miss N. Jackson 3; Miss King 1 v. Mrs. Beadle 6; Miss Everiss 6 v. Miss A. Solo 4; Miss Brake 0 v. Miss Arthur 2. Men’s Singles.—Don Cameron 9 r. A. Anbury 8: J. H. Thompson 9 v. L. M’lsaao 5; AY. Wilson 9 v. P. C. Ainbury 0; Dudley Cameron 9 v. R. Jackson 5; Geo. Griffin 9 v. A. Ambury, sen., 4 ; H. S. Dunlop 7 v. L. Sole 9. Ladies’ Doubles.-—Misses Tichbon and AVilson 2 v. Misses Potior and Hurlo 6; Misses Mackay and King 5 v. Miss Jackson and Mrs. Beadle 6; Misses Everiss and Brake 0 v. Misses Solo and Arthur 5. Monks Doubles. —AATIson and Dudley Cameron 9 v. L. M 1 Isaac and Jackson 6; Griffin and Dunlop 5 v. A. Ambury, son., and Sole 6. Combined Dongles.—Miss AVilson and Thompson 5 v. Miss Hurlo and L. M‘lsaac 6; Miss Mackay and AVilson 6 v. Miss Jackson and P.'C. Anibnrv 0; M iss King and Dudley Cameron 5 v. Mrs. Beadle .and R. Jackson G; Miss Brake and Dunlop 5 v. Miss Arthur and L. Sole 6. Totals.—Stratford AV.Y.M.I, 131: Fitzrov 103.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19100211.2.69

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume LV, Issue 14132, 11 February 1910, Page 7

Word Count
465

NEW PLYMOUTH v. WAITARA. Taranaki Herald, Volume LV, Issue 14132, 11 February 1910, Page 7

NEW PLYMOUTH v. WAITARA. Taranaki Herald, Volume LV, Issue 14132, 11 February 1910, Page 7