Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE

REICHSTAG FIRE “TRIAL” DISTRESS OF ONE ACCUSED V ■ DENIAL OF COMMUNISM BREAKDOWN IN THE COURT By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright Leipzig, Sept 28. A mass of conflicting evidence regarding the relations of Van der Lubbe and the three alleged Communists, who are also charged, was the chief feature of the Reichstag fire trial to-day. Zachow, one of the three, stoutly denied that he was a Communist, and wept bitterly in court. He was manifestly cowed and terror-stricken, his nerve being shattered as the result of his experiences in a concentration camp. Cross-examined, he admitted using uncomplimentary language about a Storm Trooper who kicked a Communist. Turning to the president of the Court he said: “Sorry, Mr. Councillor. I, ought not to have done such a thing,” and implored the president to release him from the camp, saying: “I have been punished enough.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19330930.2.91

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 30 September 1933, Page 7

Word Count
142

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE Taranaki Daily News, 30 September 1933, Page 7

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE Taranaki Daily News, 30 September 1933, Page 7