VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
THE TERM EXPLAINED. “If you use such a term as ‘vocational education,’ ” said Sir William Beveridge, Diredtor of the London School of Economics, in a speech at Bournemouth, “some people begin looking down their noses as if training for a particular vocation was something vulgar, was not education at all, was certainly not the education of a gentleman, nor a thing that r a self-respecting university should undertake.. But, of course, the people who talk like that have themsdlves omitted among other things to pursue the highly respectable study of history and the history of v university in particular. Universities very largely began as training centres fdr particular vocations and have continued to be that ever since. There is nothing vulgar or narrow about training with a definite purpose in view. You do not make education liberal simply by making it useless—a thing in the air without regard to any future career. On the other hand, vocational training is narrow only if you choose to make it so. The; best man in any line of business is the man who knows that business, so let us train for each vocation by teaching men both what is inside the vocation and always something- outside it as well.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAWC19361023.2.20
Bibliographic details
Te Awamutu Courier, Volume 53, Issue 3825, 23 October 1936, Page 4
Word Count
208VOCATIONAL EDUCATION Te Awamutu Courier, Volume 53, Issue 3825, 23 October 1936, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Te Awamutu Courier. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.