Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DEMOCRACY ON TRIAL

FAILURE IN AUSTRALIA ESSENTIALS OF SUCCESS “WORKERS, NOT HOBOES’’ .■ Bishop Crotty, of Bathurst, addressing members of the Constitutional Association in Sydney this week, said that Australia did not possess democracy. There was little or no government, nor was there government by the people. He could find nobody who was being enriched by it in body, mind or spirit. “i can take you out this afternoon to thousands of men and women, on the land and off it, wad are being mined,” the speaker proceeded. “The democratic experiment at any time was dangerous, but it has positively no hope of being successful when it gaily jettisons every democratic principle, every sanity and every safeguard by which it is bound. Democracy stands to raise a race of men who live by work, and not hoboes.” (Cheers.) Four factors needed watching to ensure a democratic success, Bishop Crotty said. Democracy must have its backgrounds, its principles, its policies, and its parties. It was largely the business of education and religion to provide its backgrounds. It was those backgrounds which they had largely lost. Democracy could be built only on men and women who believed in man and believed in God. It could not be built on cynicism or unfaith. It must hitch its waggon to some star. When its backgrounds disappeared its principles went with them. One such that had left them was the principle of fellowship. The greatest danger of to-day was a certain dogged, savage, relentless determination to keep men and classes apart. The men behind this conspiracy posed as pacifists. They were veritable doves of peace when national integrities were threatened. But they did not mind how much industrial explosives they left about or how many lighted matches they dropped among them. No return to democracy was possible until this conspiracy against their social unities had been defeated. Authority .Displaced Democracy, too, was based on work. Sentimentalists who quoted Scripture freely and uncritically, in deleuce of their own pot obsessions, might be reminded that, while the care of the weaker brethren should always he a charge on their true democratic instincts, there was nevertheless no benediction promised or hinted, either in history or in Holy Writ, to a nation th%t insisted on reducing the output of its giants to the capacity of its dwarfs. Democracy, moreover, was based on a fundamental loyally and on the authority of the common will. But that authority to-day had well nigh left them, its sovereignty replaced by lawless bullies and petty oligarchies, which possessed no democratic charter and yet increasingly dominated their affairs. Having recovered their backgrounds and their principles they must make those principles flow down into their policies and become operative in them, and then set about the further task of fashioning the lighting implements which would make those larger policies vocal in their Legislatures. Many new movements, said Bishop Crotty, were Springing up that were dedicated to this end. But they were bewildered and competitive. They needd marshalling under some common banner if their efforts were to be made practically operative. A New Public Opinion

In the last resort, it was the people that must be lifted to new dedications. There was a g'reat cry abroad for some new leader. But it was not only better leaders —it was better followers that Australia needed. The people of that country, on the whole, had had better leaders than their political indifference had deserved. It was easy to sneer at professional politicians; but were men prepared to go in and take the slings and arrows and the storms of public life, and burn their boats, and go in and out unpaid? They would IhuT it difficult to staff their Legislatures with men of that heroic stuff. Even such men as these could do little to arrest the drift, until a new public opinion and a new patriotism were ranged behind them, which refused to enthrone a party above the State. “I think politicians should be paid, but I do object to being misgoverned and misguided by incompetents and windbags,” the bishop added.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19310318.2.10

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume I, Issue 84, 18 March 1931, Page 3

Word Count
682

DEMOCRACY ON TRIAL Stratford Evening Post, Volume I, Issue 84, 18 March 1931, Page 3

DEMOCRACY ON TRIAL Stratford Evening Post, Volume I, Issue 84, 18 March 1931, Page 3