Supreme Court.
(By Telegraph.') WELLINGTON, June?. In banco this morning before Mr Justice Richmond, the appeal against the conviction under the Shops and ShopAssistants Act in which Mr Hutchison, SiM., had in March last fined W. H. Day, of Grey town North, for keeping Ins shop open on Saturday, the; day appointed by the Borough Council for the half-holiday, came up for decision: Mr Skerrett, who appeared: in support of the appeal, submitted that “ January next,” where used in section 9 of ■ the Act, must be held to -mean January, 1896. He also urged that the Borough Council meeting at which the special resolution was passed was improperly called. ' ‘ , , Mr Chapman, for the respondent, argued that the statute must be taken to speak from the date of the Royal; assent - Mr Chapman ■ also ■ contended ■ that th council meeting had been legally called. His Honour said that as the matter was of: general importance he would give a written judgment. He remarked that at present he did not think that there was much in the point raised _byMr Skerrett, with' regard to the Act being inoperative until January, 1896,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18950608.2.8
Bibliographic details
South Canterbury Times, Issue 8228, 8 June 1895, Page 1
Word Count
188Supreme Court. South Canterbury Times, Issue 8228, 8 June 1895, Page 1
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.