Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Supreme Court.

(By Telegraph.') WELLINGTON, June?. In banco this morning before Mr Justice Richmond, the appeal against the conviction under the Shops and ShopAssistants Act in which Mr Hutchison, SiM., had in March last fined W. H. Day, of Grey town North, for keeping Ins shop open on Saturday, the; day appointed by the Borough Council for the half-holiday, came up for decision: Mr Skerrett, who appeared: in support of the appeal, submitted that “ January next,” where used in section 9 of ■ the Act, must be held to -mean January, 1896. He also urged that the Borough Council meeting at which the special resolution was passed was improperly called. ' ‘ , , Mr Chapman, for the respondent, argued that the statute must be taken to speak from the date of the Royal; assent - Mr Chapman ■ also ■ contended ■ that th council meeting had been legally called. His Honour said that as the matter was of: general importance he would give a written judgment. He remarked that at present he did not think that there was much in the point raised _byMr Skerrett, with' regard to the Act being inoperative until January, 1896,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18950608.2.8

Bibliographic details

South Canterbury Times, Issue 8228, 8 June 1895, Page 1

Word Count
188

Supreme Court. South Canterbury Times, Issue 8228, 8 June 1895, Page 1

Supreme Court. South Canterbury Times, Issue 8228, 8 June 1895, Page 1