CONTROL OF SWIMMING
CONFIDENCE IN COUNCIL CIIANOIS NOT SUPPORTED (Per Pross Association.) CHRISTCIICRCH, this day. ( So far the Otago Swimming Centre’s criticism of the New Zealand council has fallen on. ha itch ground 1 . Already the Canterbury and Auckland centres have expressed their confidence in the council, and have unanimously turned down the Otago proposal that the headquarters of the council should be changed from Christchurch. Now another centre, Hawke’s Bay, lias carried a. motion of confidence in the. council. At a meeting of the Hawke’s Bay centre held a. few days ago, the Otago proposals failed to ihul any support. The delegates contended' that the points put forward against the council were, incorrect, or only half correct, and that to change the headquarters would serve no practical purpose, but would lead to a disorganisation of swimming control in the Dominion.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19361007.2.173
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19139, 7 October 1936, Page 15
Word Count
141CONTROL OF SWIMMING Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19139, 7 October 1936, Page 15
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.