Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OPOTIKI CONTROVERSY

SUPREME COURT CASE MAYOR GIVES WAY (Per Press Association.) AUCKLAND, this day. Following prolonged dissension in the Opotiki Borough Council, application was made to the Supreme Court to-day by two councillors, Messrs. J. Anderson and S. Shalloon, for a writ to compel the Mayor, Mr. G. S. Moody, to call a meeting and put a motion of which notice was given on July 13, ‘‘That tho town clerk, C. H. Fleming, be, and is hereby dismissed from his office as town clerk/’

When the ease was called, counsel for Moody said the Mayor, believing he was acting according to the rules, had refused to put the motion, but he now agreed to do so, as he had been advised that the view lie took of the position was wrong. Counsel for the councillors, notwithstanding the Mayor’s .undertaking, asked that a writ be 'issued, but Mr. Justice Herdman said; ‘‘lf you have a promise from the defendant that he will do just what yon want him to do, what on earth is the use of continuing this application? It is only a Waste of time and money. What i' propose to do is to adjourn the matter.” The matter was adjourned for a fortnight. .

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19330913.2.149

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18192, 13 September 1933, Page 11

Word Count
205

OPOTIKI CONTROVERSY Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18192, 13 September 1933, Page 11

OPOTIKI CONTROVERSY Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18192, 13 September 1933, Page 11