Article image
Article image

I 1 iyuvp s presented to the llorourh Council lasi ((Veiling await Mm now valuations of niUiticipnl" property in the business and catli;n - l a ll areas showed a decrease m lho unimproved value of ( f'w3b. (lie ohl Valnatiuii being JB3SjMO, end the new valuation £2b,C46 If these figures should prove do be rojirosont;oli e of -.a hint ions llinvaghoiit tlui borough tlie eeinudl will hire to iuere.ise the .rale pen S'A of, on improved value ’ sid • slanlinlly, In :ve a return e- I ni.;iJout i the amount of last year's, rales. The int i oast would bo dtp ivaleiit to about two-ninths of last- year's rate 1)' fid in the. £I, and would bring the total rate !'*er £l. In' hoi ween Std and JOd. Most property owners l a -e been estimating their 'rating liabilities at 'about this %nre, and those whose properties have increased in the raminr r'cd value have doubtless calculated fairly closely the ■amount of revenue they will afford to the council on the 'new values.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19300409.2.94

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LV, Issue 17230, 9 April 1930, Page 8

Word Count
171

Untitled Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LV, Issue 17230, 9 April 1930, Page 8

Untitled Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LV, Issue 17230, 9 April 1930, Page 8