I 1 iyuvp s presented to the llorourh Council lasi ((Veiling await Mm now valuations of niUiticipnl" property in the business and catli;n - l a ll areas showed a decrease m lho unimproved value of ( f'w3b. (lie ohl Valnatiuii being JB3SjMO, end the new valuation £2b,C46 If these figures should prove do be rojirosont;oli e of -.a hint ions llinvaghoiit tlui borough tlie eeinudl will hire to iuere.ise the .rale pen S'A of, on improved value ’ sid • slanlinlly, In :ve a return e- I ni.;iJout i the amount of last year's, rales. The int i oast would bo dtp ivaleiit to about two-ninths of last- year's rate 1)' fid in the. £I, and would bring the total rate !'*er £l. In' hoi ween Std and JOd. Most property owners l a -e been estimating their 'rating liabilities at 'about this %nre, and those whose properties have increased in the raminr r'cd value have doubtless calculated fairly closely the ■amount of revenue they will afford to the council on the 'new values.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19300409.2.94
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LV, Issue 17230, 9 April 1930, Page 8
Word Count
171Untitled Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LV, Issue 17230, 9 April 1930, Page 8
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.