PRIVY COUNCIL.
EMPIRE’S ULTIMATE COURT. LEND THY LIST FROM NEW ZEALAND. i At present there arc pending an unusual number of appeals to the Privy Council from Now Zealand Court decisions. On tlic average not more than two or three cases go forward from New Zealand each year to the ultimate tribunal in England. At the present time, however, there are no fewer than eight eases going forward, amongst which arc the following: Lysnar v. Gisborne Harbor Board; Long v. Barker, an Auckland will case; The King i’. The Crown Milling Company and Distributors, Ltd., and others, in connection with the alleged llourmilling trust; Wright v. Morgan; Bossett v. AVilkinsQn, a case of rescission of contract; Gardiner v. To Peru and others, arising out of a native lease case; Cleave v. McDonald; and Manawatu Drainage Board v. Tremaine. In a number of these eases, Mr. M. Myers, K.C., will appear for one, or other of ,the parties, and leaves for England in March. Mr. Gresson, K.C., of Christchurch, will also appear.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19260130.2.115
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16946, 30 January 1926, Page 14
Word Count
171PRIVY COUNCIL. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16946, 30 January 1926, Page 14
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.