The Fox Commission.
By Telegraph—Presa Association.] | Wellington, This Day. Tho conclusion arrived at by the Fox Lot ti t- Commission is that the newspape r obtained the information during ho period which elapsed from th time tho letter was laid on Mr Cadman’s table nnt'l it was seen by him in tho afternoon ; that at tome portion of that time the letter was in Sir Patrick Buckley’s possession and that the information which appeared in the paper was positively from the original correspondence on
the 4th April. Against this a declaration by Mr E. T. (itUon, editor of the newspaper mentioned. The conclusion arrived at by the Commission having been made known to him he has made a declaration before a Jus-
tice of the Peace, stating positively that the assumption that his paper obtained the information on the 4th April while the letter was in the po-session of Sir Patrick Buckley or Mr ( adman, or that the information was obtained from them or from their messenger is altogether contrary to fact; that neither directly or indirectly were Sir Patrick Buckley or Mr Cadman or the messenger concerned or implicated in his paper having obtained the information regarding the letter: and that it did not reach the paper in the manner assumed by the Commissioner in hit report.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PAHH18940629.2.19
Bibliographic details
Pahiatua Herald, Volume II, Issue 168, 29 June 1894, Page 3
Word Count
218The Fox Commission. Pahiatua Herald, Volume II, Issue 168, 29 June 1894, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.