Eketahuna R.M. Court.
September 15th.
(Before Mr Hutchinson, K.M.) Croak v. Burke.—Claim for goods supplied £1 15s lOd. Judgment for amount with costs. Pulling v. Fowler.—Adjourned judgment summons. Mr Haslett for plaintiff, Mr Jackson for defendant. His Worship intimated that in consequence of what had been said in the case Fowler v. Pelling which was heard at Masterton, he had decided to grant a rehearing of the case heard l>efore Colonel Roberts, to next Court day. -McGill v. Bright, claim £4 7s (id. Mr Haslett appeared for plaintiff and Mr Jacobsen for defendant. This was a case arising out of one heard last Court day, wherin plaintiff claimed a set-off for breach of agreement. Defendant stated that work had been done as contained in the agreement he had furnished. The agreement produced showed that oilier writing had been added since he had signed it. Defendant was non-suiteu with costs. Thomas v. Thomas. An application bv the wife for a prohibition order against Mr Nusleand. Tin old- r was granted, and to hold good throughout the district. The Court then adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PAHH18930918.2.11
Bibliographic details
Pahiatua Herald, Volume I, Issue 51, 18 September 1893, Page 2
Word Count
180Eketahuna R.M. Court. Pahiatua Herald, Volume I, Issue 51, 18 September 1893, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.