Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ACTION FOR DAMAGES.

QUESTION OF LIMITATION. WELLINGTON, January 30. The Court oi Appeal to-day delivered judgment m tiie ease of Robins v. the union steam !snip Company, raising tho yucst.on whether, in an action .against an employer by a wife or other dependent of a deceased servant, through the negligence of a fellow-servant, damages are uui.niited, or whether damages are limited to £SOO. The question turned on tho construction of section 62 of ''The Workers Compensation Act, 1908/' as amended by section 13 of the Act ot 1911. Ihe claim was lor £IOOO by plaintiff, as daughter of the late John Robins, who died as the result of an accident on a steamer on April 2, 1917. The defendants issued a summons to amend the claim by reducing the amount to £SOO. In the lower court Mr Justice Hosking dismissed the summons, and the defendants now asked the Appeal Court to review Mr Justice Hosking's decision. The Chief Justice and Mr Just:oe. Ooormr upheld the contention that tho claim must be limited to £SOO under tho Workers' Compensation Act. Mr Justice Denniston and Mr Justice Chapman hold that the claim was not so limited. Mr Justice Hosking's decision therefore sl&nda Leave to appeal was granted.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19180206.2.61

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3334, 6 February 1918, Page 25

Word Count
205

ACTION FOR DAMAGES. Otago Witness, Issue 3334, 6 February 1918, Page 25

ACTION FOR DAMAGES. Otago Witness, Issue 3334, 6 February 1918, Page 25