JAPAN AND SIBERIA.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 18446, 6 January 1922, Page 5

JAPAN AND SIBERIA.

ADMIRAL NATO’S EXPLANATION. THE SHANTUNG RAILWAY, {Fbom the Special Repbesentative of the Australian Press Association.) WASHINGTON, January 4. (Received Jan. 5, at 8.5 p.m.) The Shantung, conversations were resumed on the initiative of Japan, but it is understood that Mr M'Murray was the go-between, conveying the views of Mr Hughes and Mr Balfour. Both parties should endeavour to break the deadlock. Admiral Kato issued a statement modifying somewhat the denials of the Japanese assistance to the white Russians in Siberia in 1918 when the German and Austrian prisoners of war joined the Bolshev-, ist forces, necessitating Allied action there. This was done in full accord with the Allied policy. When the German menace ceased the Russian generals began to quarrel and, Japan withdrew her support, deciding to observe strict neutrality in Siberia. Thereafter she gave no assistance to General Semenoff. Admiral Kato says that he is most hopeful that the Root resolutions with Mr Balfour’s amendments will be accepted by all the Powers to-morrow. It is understood that Japan to-day offered to transfer the Shantung railway to China on condition that China agrees to a loan as a method of payment to Japan for money duo. Germany wanted a loan for a period of 20 vears with the option of repayment in 10 years. China still held out for a cash payment, though the indications are that the delegation will eventually agree to the terms. Official: The Japanese delegation having received instructions fipm Tokio on the subject of the Shantung railway, the Chinese and Japanese conversations were resumed this afternoon, and adjourned until to-morrow, when the conversations will be completed.—A. and N.Z. Cable. (Fbom the Special Repbesentative op THE AUSTBALIAN PbESS ASSOCIATION.) WASHINGTON, January 5. (Received Jan. 5, at 11.5 p.m.) One of the Japanese main contentions, at to-day’s inconclusive discussion was that the Shantung railway never belonged to China, and therefore could not bo restored to her. The line was built with German capital and transferred to Japan under the Versailles Treaty. The value was charged against Japan’s reparation account. The Japanese maintain, therefore, that it is right that China should pay for the property in a manner most suitable to Japan’s interests. The Chinese representatives continue to issue documents designed to show that Japan is attempting to overthrow the Republic. Another batch is being issued tonight, charging the Japanese with supporting the various Russian groups which were attacking in June last. The documents are mostly inconclusive, and do not connect the Japanese Government with the operations.—A. and N.Z. Cable.,