MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13632, 29 June 1906, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thursday, Juke 28.

(Before MrH. Y. WitUlowson, S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintllls, by delimit, ill the following undefended case?: — J(ns?p.y-H»rti9 Co. (Mr licmon) v. George Smith (Ueraidinc), claim A'lC l'j.i lid, amount of an overdue promissory note, and iiilpre.il, with costs (£1 ins fi;l); KcniniU anil Xicolson v. WUliuiu K. Kim (Chiislelmr'ehl. claim 19s, lor goods supplied ami engraving done, with costs (3s); diaries Bee,g ami Co., Lid:. (Mr W. A. Hriigli) v. Thomas Klliolt (Palmerslon North), claim £a IDs, tor goods sold and delivered, with costs (Jtl 3b lid): Dawson and Go., Ltd. (Mr A. E. Irwin), v. Alarm Brookes, claim £1 5* lid, goods supplied, with costs (lis); Henry Isaacs (Mr W. L. Moore) v. Arthur A. W. Maxwell (lioloiuu), claim £1 Us Id, good:) supplied, wilh costs (ss); The Public. Trustee, as executor in. Hie estoto of Henry Frederick ll'ihly, deceased (Mr \V. L. Mooic), v. "William Toomcr. claim £;', 10s Od, with cost* (10s); Somilel Nicholson (Mr Lemon) v. Joseph Shore (CroinWeM), claim £13 Ift 3d, amount of an overdue promissory note and interest, with costs (£2 Ms). Judgment Summons.—Septimus de Leon (Mr Ewilig) v. "William Biidilicoiu.—Olfim £3 "s. balance due oil a. promissory r.cle and interest—Order livaclo by consent, directing amount to be paid in instalments, of 11)8, first instalment to lie pnid on July 2G, and thcroafter every four Weeks,

Defended Case.—Arthur Alexander Adam* v. William Kilpattick.-Claim ft lfa, fcr rent due on a. cottage let by plaintiff to defendant at ft weekly rental of lis, of which rent threo weeks, from March 1, 1906. were still dueDefendant counter-claimed for fl 17s, on tho (iround (1) that plaintiff, agreed when letting the premises to defendant that ho (plaintiff) would withdraw (be premises let from sale, the house, then being in the market, and (2) that tho plaintiff failed to keon such agreement, but. on ,Ibe contrary, sold the premises within a few months of letting Ibcnr to defendant, whereby defendant was obliged io move, mid put to expenso to the amount slated in the counter claim,—Mr Davcy for plaintiff, Mr Baron for defendant.—After hearing the evidence, judgment was given for plaintiff on claim and counter claim with costs (3s).