MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13210, 17 February 1905, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

16 _ ;e l Thursday, Febbuahy 16. jo (Before Mr C. 0. Graham, S.M.) in "Judgment for plaintiffs was given in t ot following undefended casea:—Mitchell i io Pickard (Mr Stamper) v. George Bain,' for n- lis Id, for goods supplied, with costß (10; of Central Mataura, Gold Dredging Company { tt,' J, MacGregorj v. George A. Oborn (Timar fa for ft Qs Sd, with costs (10s), balance y, liquidation call du'e; the same v. Susan And 10 son (Timaru), for JE2 lis 6d, calls due, wi le . costs (103); the same v. John Steele H it (Timaru), for £22 10s, calls due,' with co: el (£3 4s); Isidore S. de Beer, trading as t in- Anglo-New Zealand Cycle Company (j it Moore), v. Ada Gilmore (OrmontWille), for :s ss, for hire of sewing machine, with costs | id 3s Gel) j the same v. John M'Kmley, jun., i £14 10s,. for bicycle hire, with costs (£2 ;e 6d); Harold H. Liddle v. George Pattersc le for 12s 3d, for goods supplied, with costs {5s k Drapery and General Importing Compar le Limited (Mr Moore), v. Charles J. Mort. 11 (Balclutha), for £4 10s lid, foi goods supplic y with costs (10s); Ota;»o Farmers' Co-operati 1, Association v. Donald P. Seinple (Eweburi y for £8 17s, balance due 011 sheep bought n 1901, with costs (8s); Edward J. .Bryant ;r John K'Neil, John Mowat, and William Pet d Anderson, for £6, amoifnl dtoe On a promisso it note, with costs (14s); New Zealand Ilarawa d Company v. John J. Ramsay, for £6 19s 0 n for goods supplied (in connection with Earns; 1- and Espie's rabbit agency), with costs (10s Evening Star Co.,.Ltu (Mr Barou), v. Free il rick E. M'Kenzic (Dannevirke), for £15 14 I, 011 a promissiory note, with costs (il. 5s Gd! e Brace, Windle, Blyth, and Co. (Mr Moore) n Edwin Arthur Irwin (Timaru). for £.1 15s 8 e for goods supplied, with costs (10s); D. Math 1 son and Co. (Mr Baron) v. William Dick, fi ■, £5 Gs, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 ! y 6d); George M. Wilkie (Mr Baron) v. Kennel s M. Phin, for £3 10s, for goods supplied', wit o costs (10s). Arthur M. Byrne (Mr Stamper) v. Hari s Walts, salesman (Mr Jfacassej l ).—Claim f< t iCo Is 3d, money alleged to have been receivc t by defendant from Briscoe and Co., Wellin] a ton, for the use of plaintiff.—For the defent - it was contended that the money had nevi f bsen reteived by defendant, and plaintiff wt t nonsuited without evidence being called fc k the defence; costs, £1 10s. r. Mary Miller (Mr Duncan) v. John M'Dowel j —Claim 18s, for rent due.—Judgment fc t plaintiff for lGs, costs.