TO THE EDITOR.
Sir—l am greatly surprised to find sonic few of those who, on Friday laßt, voted for Mr Bathgate now supporting Mr Macandrew for the Superintendency. This appears to me utterly unaccountable, provided those now alluded to Voted for Mr'_' Bathgate on any principle of local or general policy, or now support Mr Macandrew on any other, than personal grounds, and simply because it is Mr Macandrew. ; It must be obvious to any one who looks at the matter for ;a moment that for any one first to vote for Mr Bathgate and then to vote for Mr Macandrew, is for one to /stultify himself, and t» pull down with one hand what he get up with the other. To prove this, we have only to see the programme of the two men to contrast them. . ■ ; MrBATHOATB: Mr Macaitdrew :! lam opposed to as- lam in favour of a slated immigration. large introduction of assisted immigrants^, and to this end supported the ImmigrationandPublic Works Acts of the General Government, ' The Otago Hun- The Hundreds B.edreds Regulation Act gulation Act limits is bad, and should be the compensation to instantly repealed, the squatter, profit was passed m the motes settlement most objectionable facilitates the placing manner, and ties up of land on the martheland, as it gives ket^ and should be unlimited, compenafc. administered, not retion to the squatter., pealed; , .-,■ ;. ■ I would ' prevent "Mr Macandrew rethe, land passin|{ in grete Lthat the pre| large quantities into._ emptive right of 720 the hands of one man, apres waa nofc conand would encourage ; ceded sooner, wheE the bbtainirig of a the runholder was in homestead by every a better position than working man. he is how to avail "••■: ' ." . himself of it, -and, --•-■■ ~ would"'promote the ...-,'., .placing a landed aris-| tbcracy'in Otago. : I will oppose the W% snpporfc the Government scheme scheme, aa he is asof . Finance, unles3 sured that aay alteramodified bo as; to, tion made in it will secure the'.intefeste ; befor theworaei ! ! 'of the Middle Island. : ; ! J te\ in fov^nr ; bf^a decided '■'•( \r:S6ath;ern, vernment;'; schemes,; policy, arid thei local- though >.y-%a^ said it' iaiation 'of expend!- would bo complicate ture. . /: the>ifinancial rela-l
: , ;■•''< tions of the colony as •"■-■• ■.' •!:.'::'. .■."'■;■ ' '.'■■ ; :to j 'reiider; -Separatibni V ' • \ mvioh. pibre difficult; ■• ■":■'/■■'■■''■ ■l-:.\\^^\' ■k'^.M('S*'!-",;:'";''-- '• And so on through their whole policy ; but enough is already stated to show that it is ■ impossiblp ..mth^nyldegr^oicconsißtflncy to! support Mr Macandrew after having voted for Mr Bathgate.—l am, &c, ' \ ~■;.': ■:.: <■■..; ■)\f ; OBSEKVEBir !
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18710125.2.27
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 2798, 25 January 1871, Page 3
Word Count
408TO THE EDITOR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 2798, 25 January 1871, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.