Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

THIS DAY. | E«f->re Major Keddell. S.M.) ■-■-s Watson was charged that he did, 73-jk the 15th May, 1901. ait Oa- - S "v*n!lv" steal one Oladstone hag, --(I suit "of clothes, one Masonic • -~>j white shirts, wo Oxford shirts. V-trroof overcoat, two white silk and a small book of photos, t.-j' r.uue 'of 59 15s, from the 1-': Hotel. the property of one Robert ia. Oamaxu. being an indictable -*i: King showed, that ,the prose•Wa boarder in the Queen's Hotel, rlie owner of a threshing mill in '■—y. Mr Chambers left the hotel .ji February List on business, and ;-r:crn for some months. On the (rladstone bag whichMr Cham- ' in the hot-el, was found ka. in a back street and the ara r.cted. Suspicion fell on the h.'.o. after ithe theft of the bag, : k--;enced to a term in Dunedin 12ifects there were searched; with ;"aac a shirt, identified by pro- .. fcis property, was found among : admitted being in Oamara thne the bag was found rifled. Clumbers, null-owner, stated that srfee Qceen's Hotel on the 25th Eeb■iut. Leaving the Gladstone bag pro:in Mrs Wise's care. The bag con- : the articles enumerated in the in-, don. Tlie value of the bag and ar- - be about £9 15s. He left the and strapped in his -bedroom, :ii Jlrs Wise about it. Witness next i; faa J in -the Police Station about- a i;;o. The lock was then broken, as been forced open, and was other:i=!ced. All the contents but- a ferw ?T;re gone. The shirt (produced tart- of the contents of the bag left it in the hotel. Witness the loop on the back of the colwitness himself .put' on. He * liso r>— a stain. He also thought stsscktle and two collars produced feat could not swear to it-, iie Wise, wife of the licensee of *'j Hotelj stated that she knew the 5 rho had be»n for three or four :-5 at the Queen's. It would not Qris twelve months ago. Witness ; jie complainant, Robert ChuH- '■ i February last- he left the Queen's, - tr was hoarding, to go to his sr." rtill in the country. Mr Cham!:de to witness, when he was leavi' V cis has. Witness had not- seen «a*i since he left his employ at the Witness knew the produced Mr Chambers had at the Queen's - tns boarding there. He had left i'i cerc-re to go threshing, and had hji is: bis bag in witness' charge. He I® ci ibis occasion. About- two months >*» t«iice went to the Queen'* with 1 tac. which appeared to have Jd£. laborer, deposed that he 17 Merged. Witness last saw him trres months ago, just- above ithe ; Hotel. It. was some time in the Witness recognised the bag ■biosd the one he saw under ■H bouse in Humber street below stables on the 15th May last-. 1 : -C did not to have been there - WncT» irit-ness pulled the bag from tic bouse it was open, with the apof having been forced. This was " ~'>r.- sit the accused near the Hotel. Witness could not- say '!«r. Witness could sweax it- was betime accused came out of gaol

tee time witness found the bag, that is~ tfce accused near tie Queen's Hotel. ": r r Hunt deposed t-fcat- on infortjc received he visited an empty house psbe? street, on 15th May last, and p it? bar produced, whiah was empty, ':ti tor =«">me papers. Some of the c-sj core Robert Chambers' najne, and witness took the ba<* to the 41 s. "here Mrs Wise identified it as r.f Robert Chambers 1 . Later . ity Mr Chambers also identified it u witness a list- of ithe airticles the I pi contained. Witness knew the acHe l I been ".vorkirtc at the Queen s *--• ''boot?." He came of gaol on '.-. it. Stable Connolly stated that he knew iicssed. Witness arrested him in Duns- for which 'he got 18 months' imJOittt On information Teceived from witness searched the belongings -- accused in Dvmedin Gaol, and found = _Uifc-rd shin. two collars and tie now Witness interviewed the ac~"o claimed the shirt as his pro•v v - Accused -told •witness ab«nt the &th / r *^ i: he had only been recently dis°f}?- kf-m ( gaol, and had been a few *^®Y¥ llaru * Tha* was before witne.sx '_«•« aim. Witness arrested accused on case on the 29th July. had nothing to say in answer ■ii caarge. and was committed for trial of the Supreme Court

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM19010916.2.23

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume XXVI, Issue 8228, 16 September 1901, Page 3

Word Count
738

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume XXVI, Issue 8228, 16 September 1901, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume XXVI, Issue 8228, 16 September 1901, Page 3