Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

DIVORCE AND OTHER CASES MANY APPLICATIONS TO BE HEARD CIVIL SITTINGS ON WEDNESDAY The following oases are set down for hearing at the Supreme Court, commencing on Tuesday, July 28th:— BEFORE JUDGE AND SPECIAL JURY Edgar Horne and Harriett Horne T. A. and T. Burt, Ltd., .£2IBB 9s 6d, damages for alleged negligence. BEFORE JUDGE AND COMMON JURY George Bruoe Dali v. Wellington City Council, £5lO 4s 9d, damages for alleged neglige&ce. Alice Maud Ward v. "New Zealand Truth,” £IO,OOO, for alleged libel. Ethel Hills v. The . A.B.C. Motors (N.Z.), Ltd., £571 ss, damages for alleged negligence. , _ William Butler y. Sing On Tie, £315 15s, damages for alleged negligence. BEFORE JUDGE ALONE Ronald Alonso Thomas Bound y. H.M. the King, £519 4s 6d, for alleged negligence.

Eugene Schroeder v. The Public Trustee and the Attorney-General, for a declaration.

Alexander Campbell and Daniel Burke v. Mary Xavier Malone and Mary Gertrude Collins, £2887 14s Bd, balance alleged due under an agreement. Bichard Leitch v. William Charles Burge and Nellie Burge, .£446 11s Bd, allegedly due for work done. Winget Concrete Blook Company v. John Mounston Taylor, £052 13s lid, allegedly due under agreement, and counterclaim for £2OO for alleged breach of contract.

William John Lawry v. William John Fitzgerald, for an injunction. Counterclaim for £lO3l 5s lOd, balance' allegedly due under an agreement. Blanche Smith Thomas v. Thomas Alexander Peterkin, for possession. Counterclaim for a declaration. i ' John Robert McKenzie v. A. W. Burton, Ltd., £275 9s 3d, for alleged negligence. Official Assignee in Bankruptcy in the estate of. Alexander MoKay v. Levin and, Co., Ltd., for a declaration.

Thomas ’ Forsyth v. Alfred Montague Adams, £305, balance allegedly due for Work and commission. , " i National Dairy Association of New Zealand, Ltd., v. Herbert John Carroll, £1139 16s 6d, allegedly due for goods sold and delivered.

Blanche Smith v. Thomas Alexander Peterkin, for declaration. Counterclaim for a declaration:

Bedelia Barrington Brown v. Jeannie Terris, for tin injunction. . Annie Deckston v. Joseph Edward Waste rby, for possession. Robert Findlay Mac Kay v. James Joseph McMahon, for dissolution of partnership. Charles Hunter Downes v. William Belcher, £234 18s Id, balance "alleged due under an agreement. Ada France v. Fanny Lepper and Charles Henry William Lepper, £350, refund of deposit, and £2OO damages, for alleged- misrepresentation. Millie Turksma v. Leslie William Woolley, £350 damages fojr alleged misrepresentation.

Stephen Higgins v. Alice Mary Nimmo, for accounts. 1 Martha Monteith v. Hannah Flynn, £328, alleged due under a maintenance order.

Catherine Elizabeth Power v. Ainsleigh Bertram Power, for rescission of a deed. Arthur Daniel Kennedy v. Alfred Henry Fishenden and Catherine Dailey, for speoific performance. Frank Alexander v. Ernest Hadley, for possession. Edward Henry Watts v. Combined Bnyers, Ltd., £750 for alleged breach of agreement. > Clara Jane Watson v. Norman Jameß Oliver,, for a declaration. . Harry Burrows v. Arthur Daniel Kennedy, £l9O, for services allegedly rendered. Ida Mary McKeown v. James Roberts, for possession. H.M. the King v. Paris House, Ltd., £lsßl 14s, for alleged breach of the Customs Act. H.Mi the King v. Henry Levy, £495 14s 3d, for alleged breaoh of the Customs Aot.

Horace Campbell Lusty v. Arthur Roy Lusty, for possession of bonds. The Public Trustee v. The Southern Cross Assurance Company, Ltd., £250, allegedly due under a policy. . Mary Ann Pitcher v. Ronald T. McLean, : for -specifio performance. Minnie G. Ambler v. E. Hadley, for rescission of an agreement. IN DJVORCE BEFORE A JUDGE AND JURY Fredoriok Davies v. Enphemia Finlay Davies and Edward Doherty, alleged adultery. Aroada Thirza Tait vj Harry Tait, judicial separation for alleged adultery and cruelty. BEFORE JUDGE ALONE „ Ena Cross v. Percy Donald Stanley Cross, alleged adultery. . Alfred John Farquhar v. Margaret Lucy Farquhar, separation. Eva Mary Ronnie v. Ronald Bruce Rennie, separation. Ebenezer Harwood Beale v. Elsie Beale, alleged desertion. Emma Keating v. Charles Edward Keating, separation. Churles Edward Massey v. Winifred Ivy Massey and Cordner Kelly, alleged adultery. Frederick Goldsmith v. Teresa Margaret Goldsmith, restitution. lima Victoria Clark v. Charles Joseph Clark, separation. Louiß Salek v. Esther Salek, restitution. George Edward Pickett v. Sophia Jane Pickett, separation. Kathleen Piti v. James Piti, alleged desertion. Norah Mclntosh v. Thomas John McIntosh. separation. ' Frederick Janies Spelman v. 1 Ira Miriam Spelman, restitution. Dorothy Agnes Reid v. Leigh Heotor Rewi Reid, separation. Alton James v. Alice Nimmo, restitution. • ■ Elsie Mary May Maslem, v. George Thomas Maslem, alleged adultery. l Alfred Morgan v. Minnie Morgan and Thomas Samuel Bowden, alleged adultery. i

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19250725.2.54

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12199, 25 July 1925, Page 5

Word Count
745

SUPREME COURT New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12199, 25 July 1925, Page 5

SUPREME COURT New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12199, 25 July 1925, Page 5