Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

CIVIL LIST. The civil session of the Supreme Court is due to commence on Monday next. The list of cases is as follows: Before a judge and special jurv of twelve—Ramsay McDougall v. John Wells Chapman, claim for £3OOO damages for alleged misrepresentation. Before a judge and common jury of four—Thomas W. F. Marsden v. Harcourt and Co., commission, etc. Before ; a judge alone—Thomas Charles. Lloyd-Cox v. Peter Heyes and Joseph McOluggage. £437 damages for alleged ■ misrepresentation. Walter Francis Tibbutt v. John Bryant Lane, £SOO damages for alleged libel. Turnbull and Jones, Ltd., v. Taihapo Borough Council; declaration. Henry Adam Mackay v. Wellington City Council. claim for £SOO damages for bodily injury. James Stellin v, William Henry Fordham, sale of' interest in partnership. , , Before a judge and a common jury of twelve— “Now Zealand Times’ Comg any. Ltd., v. Wellington Publishing ompany, Ltd., claim for £3OOO damages for alleged libel. John Latham and James Alexander McGillivray v. William Taylor and Hugh Taylor., claim for £7OO and interest for money lent.

Before a judge and a common jury of four—Loo Wye v. Francis Wallace Mackenzie, claim for- £248 a§, wages Before a judge alone —Hamilton Gilmer and Allen MacGuire v. Mary Ann McArdle, CjSarles Perrin Skerrett and John. O’Kane, partition of land, etc. Keith Alsted Izard v. Henry Charles Clark Wright and Commercial Agency, Ltd., rescission of contract, etc Daniel Doe Hyde v; Niniwa Heremia, specific performance, etc. John Wallace Easson and Percy George Easwm v. Walter Riley, James Matson, William Miller and Thomas Torpy, claim for £42 for rent. William Charles Alfred Dimmock v. Mary Ann Wilkm® and the Public Trustee, possession of land, etc Alexander Brodie v. Stanley Stamp Company, rescission of agreement: etc. Robert Bevan v. Egbert Ransfield, specific performance. Charlotte Elizabeth Wall and Reginald St ache, Wall v. Frank Wills, removal.of. trustee, etc. Fleming Ross r. William Joseph Ferkins, Annie Ferkins, and Minrie Catherine claim for £IOO for work' done. John Latham and James Alexander McGillivray v. William Taylor, accounts.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19140211.2.126

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8653, 11 February 1914, Page 10

Word Count
335

SUPREME COURT New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8653, 11 February 1914, Page 10

SUPREME COURT New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8653, 11 February 1914, Page 10