LAWN TENNIS

New Zealand Times, Volume XXX, Issue 6679, 30 November 1908, Page 8

LAWN TENNIS

' SATO! DAY’S MATCHES. The following are the results of S’alnrda.v’i; matches in Hie Inter-Club competitions. At Day’s Bay no fewer thrill <1.4 matcher were got off, a result whioli speaks volumes tor the promptitude shown by the captains of the respective rear.i-,_ every set being finished In time to allow contestants lo leave for the city by iho. six o’clock boat. There wort, ninety-five players taking part in the fixtures decided on the above courts; — SI HELD. Brougham Hill v. Victoria College. Brougham II ill won by 8 sots to 5, 8G games to Cl. Quinncll v. Proas/'. I—9; limiter v. Do la Mare, 9—G; H. V. Howe v. Boore, 9—l; Laishley v. F, P. Wilson, ft—l; Mrs Goldie v. -Miss Van ■ .Siaveren, 7—fi; Mrs Bell v. Miss Boberts, G —7 : Quinnell and Hunter v. Bee re and Wilson, 9-0; 11. V. Howe and Lindsay v. Prousc and Do la Mare, 5—9; Laishley and ,T. A. B. Howe v. Knight, and Weston. 9—4; Mcf.damefi Goldie and Bell v. Misses Van Siaveren and Boberts. 5—7: Mesdamcs J. A. B. Howe and Lindsay v. Aliases Mclntosh and Breve, 3—7; Lindsay and Mrs .1, A, B. Howe v. Knight and Miss Reeve, 7—l; .1. A. B. Howe and Airs Lindsay v. Weston and Miss Mclntosh, 7—6. Wellington v. Thorndon. Wellington won by ft sets to 4 CUP. Brougham Hill A v. Karon. Brougham Hill A won by 8 sots bo 5, Bft games to 7ft.—Watkins v. Putnam. ft—7; Sampson v. 'Whitchorn, o—4: Lawrence v. Falconer, 4—9; Afarviner v. A. G. Henderson, 9—6; Airs ,W, E. Howe v. Alias Thompson, 5—7; Miss Archer v, Aliss Smythe, 7—l; Watkins and Dart v. Whitchorn and Falconer, 7—9; Sampson and Herd v. Putnam and A. G. Henderson, 9—6; Laurence and Alarriner v. E. S. Henderson and Kelso, 7—9; Misses Archer and Dempsey v. Misses Thompson and Smythe, 7 —3*; Airs AV. E. Howe and Aliss Davis v. Muses Bennett and Gavin, 3—7; Herd and Aliss Davis v. Kelso and Aliss Gavin, 7—5; Dart and Miss Dempsey v. E. S. Henderson and Miss Bennett, 7—6. Xcwtown v. Victoria College. Newtown won by 11 sets to 2, 100 games to 58.—Redward v. D. Smith, o—2: Xaglo v. Eichelbaum. 9—6; Lewis v. Fair. 9—4; Jones v. G. G. Smith, 9—4; Afrs Xaglo v. Aliss AXcKellar, 7—3; Aliss Robinson v. Miss Cox, 7—5; Red ward and Xaglo v. D. Smith and Eichelbaum. 9—o; Lewis and Jones v. Fair and G. G. Smith, 9—5; Murray and Powell V. F, A. Wilson and Cleghorn, 9—3; Airs Nagle and Miss Robinson v. Misses AlcKcllar and Cox, 7—3; Misses Clark and Redward v. Afisses G. Saxon and Atkinson, 6—7; Murray and Alias Clark v. F. A. Wilson and Aliss Atkinson, 3—7; Powell and Aliss Redward v. Clcghorn and Aliss G. Saxon, 7—4, Wellington v. Brougham Hill B. Wellington won by 11 sets to 2. 103 games to 64.—Femie v. O’Leary, 9—5; AlcNicol v. Veen, B—9; Sheppard v. IXurly, 9—5 ; Shand v. Boberts, 9—S

Miss Dimant v. Aliss Farmer, 7—6; Miss Francis v. Miss Webb, 7—3; Fernio and AleXicol v, O’Leary and tt'iberts. 9—4. Sheppard and Shand v. Veen and Edwards, B—9; Idler and Pollock v. Hurley and Amos, 9—2; Miss Dimant and Mrs Picrard v, Afisses Farmer and Webb. 7—4; Misses Hannah and Franris v. Misses Hayes and Crornbie. 7—-2: Filer and bliss Hannah v. Edwards and Alias Haves, 7—l : Pollock and Airs P’.ernrd v. .Amo;; and Miss Cronibi" l . 7—G. Lower Holt v. Petone. Prtone just wo.-, by 7 sets to G, ; i games to tid; tlu.l wen on games ry 11 and were unlucky to low the match. —Hawkins v Jackson 9—G; Green v. (lore, 9—7; Cornell v. tab lender, ft-5 ; ib.i A....0n v. Puniy, 4—9; Mrs Hawkins v. Miss G. Foster. 2-7; Miss He; no v. Mrs Wagg, 0-7; Hawkins and Grr'n v. JacKson aim Clere, 9—5; ( oniell and Parkinson v, Callender and Purdy. J--9; Annin and Duncan v. Hen lon Brothers, 7 9; Mrs Hawkins and Miss Penny v. bliss G. Foster and Mrs V ; 7—G: Misses Horne and Bernini e. Airs Murphy and Aliss Callender, 7—G: Duncan and Aliss Penny v, J. D. S. Heaton and Mrs Alrupiiy. 4—7; Austin and Miss Bennett v. E. D. Heaton and Miss Callender, 7—5. PEXXAXT. Brougham Hill .v. Xcwtown. Brougham Hill won by 6 sets to 1, 56 games to 27.—W. E. Howe v. Grady, 9—3; Kean v. Ilursthouse, D —4; Shorris v. Clarke, 9 —7; Aliss Hogg v. Miss Christie, 7—2; W. E. Howe and Kean v. Grady and Hursthouse, B—9; Misses Hogg and Rothschild v. Misses Christie and Bock, 7—2: Sherris and Aliss Rothschild v. Clark and Aliss Bock, 7—o. Aluritai v. Wellington. Aluritai won by 6 sets to 1, 50 games to 29.—D. Howden v. Brindley, 9—6; Wright v. Cocks, 9—-5; Sanson v. Lawson, '9—o (default); Aliss Smith v. Alias Webb. o—7; Howden and Sanson v. Brindley and Cocks, 9—6; Afisses Smith and F. Low v. Alins os Webb and Fraser, 7—5; Wright and Aliss F. Low v. Lawson and Aliss Fraser, 7—o (default). College A v. B. College A won by 6 sets to 1, 55 games to .36, —Isaacs v. Duncan, 9—3; Taylor r. Scantlebury, 7—9; Hogg v. J. AI. Tudhopo, 9—6; Aliss Saxon v. Aliss Barkas, 7—l; Isaacs and Taylor v. Duncan and Scantlebury, 9-y-7; Misses Saxon and Oooko v. Alissos Barkas and. L. Mclntosh, 7—4; Hogg and Miss Cooke v. J. AI. Tudhopo and Aliss L. Alolntosh, 7—6.

RACQUETS. Trinity B v. Bidwill street B. Bidwill street B scored their first win by 4 sets to 3 (41 games to 60).—)Palethorpo v. Parker, 9—B; Pavitt y. Smith, 9—6; .Cooke v. Rick, 9—7 ; Miss Pierard t. Miss Fisher, o—7; O. Pavitt and Cooke r, Smith and Dick, 9—S; Misses Pierard and Coveney v. Misses 'Fisher and Crowes, 3—7; Palothorpe and Miss Covoney v. Parker and Miss Orewcs, 2—7. Brougham Hill t. Bidwill street A. Bidwill street won hy 7 sets to nil, 57 games tj -24.—Hamilton v. Arden, 9—o; Bog. Pavitt v. Long, 9—7; | Swdnbnrne v. Jack, 9—6; Miss Cunningham v. Miss Powell, 7—3; Hamilton

and Pavitt v. Arden and Long, 9—o Aliss Cunningham and Airs Chapman v. Jlistes Par.ell and Creasy, 7 —l; Swinburne and Airs Chapman v. Jack and Miss Creasy, 7—2. College A v. Trinity A. College won by 5 sets to 2, 52 games to 43—E. Rutherford v. Arcus, o—3: B. Scott v. Kc-all. 9—2; Oram v. Arcus. 9—B; Aliss Oibbes v. Aliss Hayes, 4 7; Rutherford and Scott v. Arens and Keall, 9—7; Misses Globes and Taylor v. Misses Hayes and Betty, 57; Oram and Aliss Taylor v. Oreves and Miss Betty, 7 —13. Kilbirnic A v. College B. Kilbirnio won by default. Owing to several errors having taken place in the original drawing for this grade, the fixtures have all been redrawn as follows: — December sth.—Trinity B v. College B (Davbs Buy); Trinity Av. Kilbirnic B (Trinity);' Kilbirnio Av. Bidwill street A (Bidwill street) ; College A v. Bidwill street B (Day’s Bay). Brougham Hill—Byo. December 13th. —Trinity B v. Bidwill street A (Trinity); Brougham Hill v. Kilbirnio B (Kilbirnic); Trinity A v. Bidwill street B (Days Bay); College AV. B (Day’s Bay). Kilbirme A— Byo. . December 19th. —Trinity B v College A (Trinity); Brougham Bidwill street B (Brougham Hill); Kilbirnio A v. B (Kilbirnio); College B v. Bidwill street A (Bidwill street). Trinity A—Bye. THE CUP. POSITIONS OF TEIAAIS. The Oup is a remarkably even contest, and may be won by any of the four leading teams as shown in these figures:—

Captains of teams are requested to follow' out the Shield Committee’s instructions regarding the result-form which it is necessary to leave at Speed’s on Saturday, nights before 9 o’clock. Failure to do so results in an unnecessary increase of w ork on the secretary of tho Shield Committee.

Matches. Sets.. Games. 2 o £ CM <3 Cm < Newtown ... 4 0 39 13 371 256 Broug’m Hill A 4 0 35 16 371 253 Wellington ... 3 1 36 16 372 274 Paton© 3 1 32 20 550 304 Vic. College ... 1 3 13 39 266 576 Lower Hutt ... 0 3 13 26 214 263 Karorl 0 3 10 29 158 280 Broug’m HillB 0 4 16 26 283 3S7