Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A MISTAKE CORRECTED.

In our issue of last week we stated that a motion was heard on April 'J,~> by tho Chief Justice at the instance of Sir Robert Stout on behalf of Mr Wm. Sinclair, of Blenheim, to set aside an order mado by tho Court in the case of O'Sullivan v. Sinclair on July 23rd last, ordering tho defendant to pay -£7O-1 into Court, and also to set aside tho Registrar's certificate finding that sum of money to bo in Mr Sinclair's hands as trustee. We regret that wo should have fallen into an error in tho matter. Tho report should have read that the motion was made on behalf of Messrs Sinclair and O'Leary in the case of O'Sullivan v. Sinclair and O'Laory, ordering- them to pay the sum named into Court and to set aside the Registrar's certificate finding that sum of money to be in the hands of Messrs Sinclair and O'Lacry as trustees.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18960507.2.82

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Mail, Issue 1262, 7 May 1896, Page 23

Word Count
159

A MISTAKE CORRECTED. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1262, 7 May 1896, Page 23

A MISTAKE CORRECTED. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1262, 7 May 1896, Page 23