THE KIMBERLEY GOLD FIELD.
In a communication to the Albany Mail, dated the 12th May, a correspondent writes as follows: —Sir.— rfaving just returned from the Kimberley district, I wi h, through the medium of your columns to ventilate au opinion as to the best point of starting for the a-oldfields. I say undoubtedly that the best route is from Derby, aud Ido so upon the assurance of a number of diggers who have travelled both ways. All of thorn, without a single exception, contend that they would rather travel the road from Derby twice than from Cambridge Gulf once. From .Derby there is a good dray road for upwards of 60 miles, and the country is level almost as far a 3 the goldfields, whereas the road from Cambridge Gulf is mountainous aud is otherwise bad travelling. While on board the b.s. Albany, on my trip down, I beard several arguments by au interested party in favor of Cambridge Gulf, who contended that the road from Cambridge Gulf to tbe goldfields is much better than that from Derby. I may as well here state that my opinion relative to the two routes is _aa impartial one, as I have closed by business at Derby, and, personally, I have no interest there. In my opinion it is the duty of the ‘ powers that be ” to facilitate the trade and traffic of Derby as much as possible, as by assisting Cambridge Gulf we simply give a lift to South Australia without doing this Colony any good whatever. It is well-known that Adelaidehas regular communication with Port Darwin, which is only 170 miles from our goldfields, consequently by removing the centre of operations from Derby to the Gulf, will, as a matter of course, direct our trade so many miles closer to the territory of our neighborhood. With reference to the influx o? Chinese at Kimberley, this, I consider, should be nipped in the bud forthwith, for the field is undoubtedly a rich one, and likely, therefor*, to attract a large number of that very undesirably class of diggers. In conclusion, permit me to say that at Derby I saw what I never did upon any goldfield that I have previously visited in Australasia, anti that was every man who came from the field had a good prospect. Apologisinfj for 6iicro‘->>2tiing ho nuicfl on your valuable space. —Yours truly, Joseph Rogers. A Satiny Corner journal publishes a private letter concerning the Kimberley goldfields, from which the"following i* rn excerpt :—“I expected to see you in Perth on your way to the Kimberley goldfields, but, perhaps, you are only making arrangements to emigrate. I say to you do not be gulled into »he belief that Western .Australia ia a paradise. You will find it a starved out country, should yon be fo unfortunate as to go there. The land withiu 200 miles of Freernantle aud Perth is all an ocean of sand ; no rain for six months. The goldfields are in the tropics, and the rush is concocted by a lot of Queensland mine settlers for speculation. I think the whole thing is a fraud from beginning to end. Nothing is being produced in the country except a few cattle in the Kimberley district. I have been all over the United StatM, and over Mexico, and up to Alaska, but I have never in my life seen such a land as this Western Australian humbug.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18860611.2.75
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Mail, Issue 745, 11 June 1886, Page 25
Word Count
572THE KIMBERLEY GOLD FIELD. New Zealand Mail, Issue 745, 11 June 1886, Page 25
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.